[Gluster-users] Upgrade 5.3 -> 5.4 on debian: public IP is used instead of LAN IP
Hu Bert
revirii at googlemail.com
Mon Mar 18 08:54:51 UTC 2019
Good morning :-)
for debian the packages are there:
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.5/Debian/stretch/amd64/apt/pool/main/g/glusterfs/
I'll do an upgrade of a test installation 5.3 -> 5.5 and see if there
are some errors etc. and report back.
btw: no release notes for 5.4 and 5.5 so far?
https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/ ?
Am Fr., 15. März 2019 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Shyam Ranganathan
<srangana at redhat.com>:
>
> We created a 5.5 release tag, and it is under packaging now. It should
> be packaged and ready for testing early next week and should be released
> close to mid-week next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
> On 3/13/19 12:34 PM, Artem Russakovskii wrote:
> > Wednesday now with no update :-/
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Artem
> >
> > --
> > Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
> > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:28 AM Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Amar,
> >
> > Any updates on this? I'm still not seeing it in OpenSUSE build
> > repos. Maybe later today?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Artem
> >
> > --
> > Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
> > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:30 PM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
> > <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > We are talking days. Not weeks. Considering already it is
> > Thursday here. 1 more day for tagging, and packaging. May be ok
> > to expect it on Monday.
> >
> > -Amar
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:54 AM Artem Russakovskii
> > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Is the next release going to be an imminent hotfix, i.e.
> > something like today/tomorrow, or are we talking weeks?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Artem
> >
> > --
> > Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK
> > Mirror <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
> > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:09 AM Artem Russakovskii
> > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Ended up downgrading to 5.3 just in case. Peer status
> > and volume status are OK now.
> >
> > zypper install --oldpackage glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1
> > Loading repository data...
> > Reading installed packages...
> > Resolving package dependencies...
> >
> > Problem: glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64 requires
> > libgfapi0 = 5.3, but this requirement cannot be provided
> > not installable providers:
> > libgfapi0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64[glusterfs]
> > Solution 1: Following actions will be done:
> > downgrade of libgfapi0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
> > libgfapi0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > downgrade of libgfchangelog0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
> > libgfchangelog0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > downgrade of libgfrpc0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
> > libgfrpc0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > downgrade of libgfxdr0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
> > libgfxdr0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > downgrade of libglusterfs0-5.4-lp150.100.1.x86_64 to
> > libglusterfs0-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > Solution 2: do not install glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64
> > Solution 3: break glusterfs-5.3-lp150.100.1.x86_64 by
> > ignoring some of its dependencies
> >
> > Choose from above solutions by number or cancel
> > [1/2/3/c] (c): 1
> > Resolving dependencies...
> > Resolving package dependencies...
> >
> > The following 6 packages are going to be downgraded:
> > glusterfs libgfapi0 libgfchangelog0 libgfrpc0
> > libgfxdr0 libglusterfs0
> >
> > 6 packages to downgrade.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Artem
> >
> > --
> > Founder, Android Police
> > <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> | +ArtemRussakovskii
> > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> > <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:57 AM Artem Russakovskii
> > <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Noticed the same when upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4, as
> > mentioned.
> >
> > I'm confused though. Is actual replication affected,
> > because the 5.4 server and the 3x 5.3 servers still
> > show heal info as all 4 connected, and the files
> > seem to be replicating correctly as well.
> >
> > So what's actually affected - just the status
> > command, or leaving 5.4 on one of the nodes is doing
> > some damage to the underlying fs? Is it fixable by
> > tweaking transport.socket.ssl-enabled? Does
> > upgrading all servers to 5.4 resolve it, or should
> > we revert back to 5.3?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Artem
> >
> > --
> > Founder, Android Police
> > <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> > <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> > beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net/> |
> > +ArtemRussakovskii
> > <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii>
> > | @ArtemR <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:02 AM Hu Bert
> > <revirii at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > fyi: did a downgrade 5.4 -> 5.3 and it worked.
> > all replicas are up and
> > running. Awaiting updated v5.4.
> >
> > thx :-)
> >
> > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Hari
> > Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com
> > <mailto:hgowtham at redhat.com>>:
> > >
> > > There are plans to revert the patch causing
> > this error and rebuilt 5.4.
> > > This should happen faster. the rebuilt 5.4
> > should be void of this upgrade issue.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, you can use 5.3 for this cluster.
> > > Downgrading to 5.3 will work if it was just
> > one node that was upgrade to 5.4
> > > and the other nodes are still in 5.3.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:07 PM Hu Bert
> > <revirii at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Hari,
> > > >
> > > > thx for the hint. Do you know when this will
> > be fixed? Is a downgrade
> > > > 5.4 -> 5.3 a possibility to fix this?
> > > >
> > > > Hubert
> > > >
> > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 08:32 Uhr schrieb
> > Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com
> > <mailto:hgowtham at redhat.com>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a known issue we are working on.
> > > > > As the checksum differs between the
> > updated and non updated node, the
> > > > > peers are getting rejected.
> > > > > The bricks aren't coming because of the
> > same issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > More about the issue:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685120
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:56 PM Hu Bert
> > <revirii at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Interestingly: gluster volume status
> > misses gluster1, while heal
> > > > > > statistics show gluster1:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gluster volume status workdata
> > > > > > Status of volume: workdata
> > > > > > Gluster process
> > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
> > > > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Brick gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > 49153 0 Y 1723
> > > > > > Brick gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > 49153 0 Y 2068
> > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
> > N/A N/A Y 1732
> > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on gluster3
> > N/A N/A Y 2077
> > > > > >
> > > > > > vs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gluster volume heal workdata statistics
> > heal-count
> > > > > > Gathering count of entries to be healed
> > on volume workdata has been successful
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brick gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > > > > > Number of entries: 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brick gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > > > > > Number of entries: 10745
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brick gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > > > > > Number of entries: 10744
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 08:18 Uhr
> > schrieb Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Miling,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > well, there are such entries, but
> > those haven't been a problem during
> > > > > > > install and the last kernel
> > update+reboot. The entries look like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PUBLIC_IP gluster2.alpserver.de
> > <http://gluster2.alpserver.de> gluster2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 192.168.0.50 gluster1
> > > > > > > 192.168.0.51 gluster2
> > > > > > > 192.168.0.52 gluster3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 'ping gluster2' resolves to LAN IP; I
> > removed the last entry in the
> > > > > > > 1st line, did a reboot ... no, didn't
> > help. From
> > > > > > > /var/log/glusterfs/glusterd.log
> > > > > > > on gluster 2:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [2019-03-05 07:04:36.188128] E [MSGID:
> > 106010]
> > > > > > >
> > [glusterd-utils.c:3483:glusterd_compare_friend_volume]
> > 0-management:
> > > > > > > Version of Cksums persistent differ.
> > local cksum = 3950307018, remote
> > > > > > > cksum = 455409345 on peer gluster1
> > > > > > > [2019-03-05 07:04:36.188314] I [MSGID:
> > 106493]
> > > > > > >
> > [glusterd-handler.c:3843:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp]
> > 0-glusterd:
> > > > > > > Responded to gluster1 (0), ret: 0,
> > op_ret: -1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Interestingly there are no entries in
> > the brick logs of the rejected
> > > > > > > server. Well, not surprising as no
> > brick process is running. The
> > > > > > > server gluster1 is still in rejected
> > state.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 'gluster volume start workdata force'
> > starts the brick process on
> > > > > > > gluster1, and some heals are happening
> > on gluster2+3, but via 'gluster
> > > > > > > volume status workdata' the volumes
> > still aren't complete.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > gluster1:
> > > > > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Brick gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > 49152 0 Y 2523
> > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
> > N/A N/A Y 2549
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > gluster2:
> > > > > > > Gluster process
> > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
> > > > > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Brick gluster2:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > 49153 0 Y 1723
> > > > > > > Brick gluster3:/gluster/md4/workdata
> > 49153 0 Y 2068
> > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on localhost
> > N/A N/A Y 1732
> > > > > > > Self-heal Daemon on gluster3
> > N/A N/A Y 2077
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hubert
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 07:58 Uhr
> > schrieb Milind Changire <mchangir at redhat.com
> > <mailto:mchangir at redhat.com>>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There are probably DNS entries or
> > /etc/hosts entries with the public IP Addresses
> > that the host names (gluster1, gluster2,
> > gluster3) are getting resolved to.
> > > > > > > > /etc/resolv.conf would tell which is
> > the default domain searched for the node names
> > and the DNS servers which respond to the queries.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:14 PM Hu
> > Bert <revirii at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:revirii at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Good morning,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> i have a replicate 3 setup with 2
> > volumes, running on version 5.3 on
> > > > > > > >> debian stretch. This morning i
> > upgraded one server to version 5.4 and
> > > > > > > >> rebooted the machine; after the
> > restart i noticed that:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> - no brick process is running
> > > > > > > >> - gluster volume status only shows
> > the server itself:
> > > > > > > >> gluster volume status workdata
> > > > > > > >> Status of volume: workdata
> > > > > > > >> Gluster process
> > TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
> > > > > > > >>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >> Brick
> > gluster1:/gluster/md4/workdata N/A
> > N/A N N/A
> > > > > > > >> NFS Server on localhost
> > N/A N/A N N/A
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> - gluster peer status on the server
> > > > > > > >> gluster peer status
> > > > > > > >> Number of Peers: 2
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster3
> > > > > > > >> Uuid:
> > c7b4a448-ca6a-4051-877f-788f9ee9bc4a
> > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster2
> > > > > > > >> Uuid:
> > 162fea82-406a-4f51-81a3-e90235d8da27
> > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> - gluster peer status on the other
> > 2 servers:
> > > > > > > >> gluster peer status
> > > > > > > >> Number of Peers: 2
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster1
> > > > > > > >> Uuid:
> > 9a360776-7b58-49ae-831e-a0ce4e4afbef
> > > > > > > >> State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Hostname: gluster3
> > > > > > > >> Uuid:
> > c7b4a448-ca6a-4051-877f-788f9ee9bc4a
> > > > > > > >> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I noticed that, in the brick logs,
> > i see that the public IP is used
> > > > > > > >> instead of the LAN IP. brick logs
> > from one of the volumes:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> rejected node:
> > https://pastebin.com/qkpj10Sd
> > > > > > > >> connected nodes:
> > https://pastebin.com/8SxVVYFV
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Why is the public IP suddenly used
> > instead of the LAN IP? Killing all
> > > > > > > >> gluster processes and rebooting
> > (again) didn't help.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thx,
> > > > > > > >> Hubert
> > > > > > > >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > >> Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > > >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > > > > > >>
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Milind
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > > > >
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Hari Gowtham.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hari Gowtham.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amar Tumballi (amarts)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list