[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Bitrot: Time of signing depending on the file size???
David Spisla
spisla80 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 15:30:18 UTC 2019
Hello Kotresh,
allrigt, I have updated the "Component" field in the bug to 'core' . I am
looking forward fixing this bug
Regards
David Spisla
Am Di., 5. März 2019 um 16:13 Uhr schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
khiremat at redhat.com>:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for raising the bug. But from the above validation, it's clear that
> bitrot is not directly involved. Bitrot waits for last fd to be closed. We
> will have to investigate the reason for fd not being closed for large files.
>
> Thanks,
> Kotresh HR
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:13 PM David Spisla <spisla80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Kotresh,
>>
>> Yes, the fd was still open for larger files. I could verify this with a
>> 500MiB file and some smaller files. After a specific time only the fd for
>> the 500MiB was up and the file still had no signature, for the smaller
>> files there were no fds and they already had a signature. I don't know the
>> reason for this. Maybe the client still keep th fd open? I opened a bug for
>> this:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685023
>>
>> Regards
>> David
>>
>> Am Fr., 1. März 2019 um 18:29 Uhr schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
>> khiremat at redhat.com>:
>>
>>> Interesting observation! But as discussed in the thread bitrot signing
>>> processes depends 2 min timeout (by default) after last fd closes. It
>>> doesn't have any co-relation with the size of the file.
>>> Did you happen to verify that the fd was still open for large files for
>>> some reason?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:19 PM David Spisla <spisla80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>
>>>> I did some observations concerning the bitrot daemon. It seems to be
>>>> that the bitrot signer is signing files depending on file size. I copied
>>>> files with different sizes into a volume and I was wonderung because the
>>>> files get their signature not the same time (I keep the expiry time default
>>>> with 120). Here are some examples:
>>>>
>>>> 300 KB file ~2-3 m
>>>> 70 MB file ~ 40 m
>>>> 115 MB file ~ 1 Sh
>>>> 800 MB file ~ 4,5 h
>>>>
>>>> What is the expected behaviour here?
>>>> Why does it take so long to sign a 800MB file?
>>>> What about 500GB or 1TB?
>>>> Is there a way to speed up the sign process?
>>>>
>>>> My ambition is to understand this observation
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> David Spisla
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> Kotresh H R
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Kotresh H R
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190305/04fcc881/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list