[Gluster-users] GFS performance under heavy traffic

[Raghavendra Gowdappa]

What version of Glusterfs are you using? Though, not sure what's the root
cause of your problem, just wanted to point out a bug with read-ahead which
would cause read-amplification over network [1][2], which should be fixed
in recent versions.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214489
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393419

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:50 AM David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We switched a production system to using GFS instead of NFS at the
> weekend, however it didn't go well on Monday when full load hit. The
> application started crashing regularly and we had to revert to NFS. It
> seems that the problem was high network traffic used by GFS.
>
> We've two GFS nodes plus one arbiter node, each about 1.3ms latency from
> each other. Attached is a chart of network traffic on one of the GFS nodes.
> We see that it saturated the 1Gbps link before we reverted to NFS at 15:10.
>
> The question is, why does GFS use so much network traffic and is there
> anything we can do about it? NFS traffic doesn't exceed 4MBps, so 120MBps
> for GFS seems awfully high.
>
> It would also be good to have faster read performance from GFS, but that's
> another issue.
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
>
> --
> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
> http://voisonics.com/
> USA: +1 213 221 1092
> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
> ________
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> APAC Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> NA/EMEA Schedule -
> Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20191218/80fbf783/attachment.html>