[Gluster-users] Should I be using gluster 3 or gluster 4?

[Kaleb S. KEITHLEY]

On 10/31/18 2:53 AM, Jeevan Patnaik wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
> 
> Can gluster 4.1.5 too be used for production? There's no documentation
> for gluster 4.
> 

The documentation for GlusterFS 4.x and 5 is about 99.99% the same as
GlusterFS 3.x.

That's not a reason not to use GlusterFS 4.x or GlusterFS 5 IMO.

(This is a community open source project. If you think there's something
missing, that's a good place to jump in and get involved.)

> Regards,
> Jeevan.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 9:37 AM Vlad Kopylov <vladkopy at gmail.com
> <mailto:vladkopy at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     3.12.14 working fine in production for file access
>     you can find vol and mount settings in mailing list archive
> 
>     On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:05 AM Jeevan Patnaik <g1patnaik at gmail.com
>     <mailto:g1patnaik at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Hi All,
> 
>         I see gluster 3 has reached end of life and gluster 5 has just
>         been introduced.
> 
>         Is gluster 4.1.5 stable enough for production deployment? I see
>         by default gluster docs point  to v3  only  and there  are no
>         gluster docs  for 4 or 5.  Why so? And I'm mainly looking for a
>         stable gluster tiering feature and Kernek NFS support. I faced
>         few issues with tiering in 3.14 and so thinking if I should
>         switch to 4.1.5, as it will be a production deployment.
> 
>         Thank you.
> 
>         Regards,
>         Jeevan.
>         _______________________________________________
>         Gluster-users mailing list
>         Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>         https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 

-- 

Kaleb