[Gluster-users] GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Alastair Neil
ajneil.tech at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 19:25:08 UTC 2017
True but to work your way into that problem with replica 3 is a lot harder
to achieve than with just replica 2 + arbiter.
On 7 September 2017 at 14:06, Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Neil, docs mention two live nodes of replica 3 blaming each other and
> refusing to do IO.
>
> https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Split%20brain%20and%20ways%20to%20deal%20with%
> 20it/#1-replica-3-volume
>
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2017 17:52, "Alastair Neil" <ajneil.tech at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> *shrug* I don't use arbiter for vm work loads just straight replica 3.
>> There are some gotchas with using an arbiter for VM workloads. If
>> quorum-type is auto and a brick that is not the arbiter drop out then if
>> the up brick is dirty as far as the arbiter is concerned i.e. the only good
>> copy is on the down brick you will get ENOTCONN and your VMs will halt on
>> IO.
>>
>> On 6 September 2017 at 16:06, <lemonnierk at ulrar.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Mh, I never had to do that and I never had that problem. Is that an
>>> arbiter specific thing ? With replica 3 it just works.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Alastair Neil wrote:
>>> > you need to set
>>> >
>>> > cluster.server-quorum-ratio 51%
>>> >
>>> > On 6 September 2017 at 10:12, Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > I have promised to do some testing and I finally find some time and
>>> > > infrastructure.
>>> > >
>>> > > So I have 3 servers with Gluster 3.10.5 on CentOS 7. I created
>>> > > replicated volume with arbiter (2+1) and VM on KVM (via Openstack)
>>> > > with disk accessible through gfapi. Volume group is set to virt
>>> > > (gluster volume set gv_openstack_1 virt). VM runs current (all
>>> > > packages updated) Ubuntu Xenial.
>>> > >
>>> > > I set up following fio job:
>>> > >
>>> > > [job1]
>>> > > ioengine=libaio
>>> > > size=1g
>>> > > loops=16
>>> > > bs=512k
>>> > > direct=1
>>> > > filename=/tmp/fio.data2
>>> > >
>>> > > When I run fio fio.job and reboot one of the data nodes, IO
>>> statistics
>>> > > reported by fio drop to 0KB/0KB and 0 IOPS. After a while, root
>>> > > filesystem gets remounted as read-only.
>>> > >
>>> > > If you care about infrastructure, setup details etc., do not
>>> hesitate to
>>> > > ask.
>>> > >
>>> > > Gluster info on volume:
>>> > >
>>> > > Volume Name: gv_openstack_1
>>> > > Type: Replicate
>>> > > Volume ID: 2425ae63-3765-4b5e-915b-e132e0d3fff1
>>> > > Status: Started
>>> > > Snapshot Count: 0
>>> > > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
>>> > > Transport-type: tcp
>>> > > Bricks:
>>> > > Brick1: gfs-2.san:/export/gfs/gv_1
>>> > > Brick2: gfs-3.san:/export/gfs/gv_1
>>> > > Brick3: docker3.san:/export/gfs/gv_1 (arbiter)
>>> > > Options Reconfigured:
>>> > > nfs.disable: on
>>> > > transport.address-family: inet
>>> > > performance.quick-read: off
>>> > > performance.read-ahead: off
>>> > > performance.io-cache: off
>>> > > performance.stat-prefetch: off
>>> > > performance.low-prio-threads: 32
>>> > > network.remote-dio: enable
>>> > > cluster.eager-lock: enable
>>> > > cluster.quorum-type: auto
>>> > > cluster.server-quorum-type: server
>>> > > cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
>>> > > cluster.locking-scheme: granular
>>> > > cluster.shd-max-threads: 8
>>> > > cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000
>>> > > features.shard: on
>>> > > user.cifs: off
>>> > >
>>> > > Partial KVM XML dump:
>>> > >
>>> > > <disk type='network' device='disk'>
>>> > > <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/>
>>> > > <source protocol='gluster'
>>> > > name='gv_openstack_1/volume-77ebfd13-6a92-4f38-b036-e9e55d752e1e'>
>>> > > <host name='10.0.1.201' port='24007'/>
>>> > > </source>
>>> > > <backingStore/>
>>> > > <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/>
>>> > > <serial>77ebfd13-6a92-4f38-b036-e9e55d752e1e</serial>
>>> > > <alias name='virtio-disk0'/>
>>> > > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04'
>>> > > function='0x0'/>
>>> > > </disk>
>>> > >
>>> > > Networking is LACP on data nodes, stack of Juniper EX4550's (10Gbps
>>> > > SFP+), separate VLAN for Gluster traffic, SSD only on Gluster all
>>> > > nodes (including arbiter).
>>> > >
>>> > > I would really love to know what am I doing wrong, because this is my
>>> > > experience with Gluster for a long time a and a reason I would not
>>> > > recommend it as VM storage backend in production environment where
>>> you
>>> > > cannot start/stop VMs on your own (e.g. providing private clouds for
>>> > > customers).
>>> > > -ps
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > Il 30-08-2017 17:07 Ivan Rossi ha scritto:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> There has ben a bug associated to sharding that led to VM
>>> corruption
>>> > > >> that has been around for a long time (difficult to reproduce I
>>> > > >> understood). I have not seen reports on that for some time after
>>> the
>>> > > >> last fix, so hopefully now VM hosting is stable.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Mmmm... this is precisely the kind of bug that scares me... data
>>> > > corruption
>>> > > > :|
>>> > > > Any more information on what causes it and how to resolve? Even if
>>> in
>>> > > newer
>>> > > > Gluster releases it is a solved bug, knowledge on how to treat it
>>> would
>>> > > be
>>> > > > valuable.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Danti Gionatan
>>> > > > Supporto Tecnico
>>> > > > Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
>>> > > > email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
>>> > > > GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
>>> > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> > > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Gluster-users mailing list
>>> > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Gluster-users mailing list
>>> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170907/5965c275/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list