[Gluster-users] Node count constraints with EC?

[yipikai7 at gmail.com]

On 30/03/2017 08:35, Ashish Pandey wrote:
> Good point Cedric!!
> The only thing is that, I would prefer to say "bricks" instead of 
> "nodes" in your statement.
>
> "starting with 4 bricks (3+1) can only evolve by adding 4 bricks (3+1)"
Oh right, thanks for correcting me !

Cheers

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Cedric Lemarchand" <yipikai7 at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Terry McGuire" <tmcguire at ualberta.ca>
> *Cc: *gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, March 30, 2017 11:57:27 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-users] Node count constraints with EC?
>
>
> > Le 29 mars 2017 à 20:29, Terry McGuire <tmcguire at ualberta.ca> a écrit :
> >
> > I was thinking I’d spread these over 4 nodes, and add single nodes 
> over time, with subvolumes rearranged over new nodes to maintain 
> protection from whole node failures.
>
> Also keep in mind that dispersed cluster can only be expanded by the 
> number of initial nodes, eg starting with 4 nodes 3+1 can only evolve 
> by adding 4 nodes 3+1, you cannot change the default policy 3+1 to 
> 4+1. So the granularity of the evolution of the cluster is fixed at 
> the beginning.
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170330/5dbae57c/attachment.html>