[Gluster-users] bit-rot resolution

Sweta Anandpara sanandpa at redhat.com
Wed Mar 1 06:32:35 UTC 2017


Bitrot has a scrub process which detects the corrupted file. Once 
detected, it is the prerogative of the user to follow the sequence of 
steps [1] to trigger a heal. Having said that, client access to that 
file is not impacted as it continues to serve data from the good copy.
Steps remain the same irrespective of a replica 2 or replica 3 volume.

[1] 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3.1/html/Administration_Guide/ch20s03.html

Thanks,
Sweta

On 02/28/2017 06:28 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> In a replica 3, what happens in case of bit-rot detection on a file ?
> Is gluster smart enough to detect this and automatically heal the
> corrupted files from other replicas ?
> What if in case of replica 2 ? How do know know which is right,
> server1 or server2, without a quorum ?
>
> What if the underling FS (like ZFS) is retuning an error in case of
> bit-rot ? ZFS should return an error if file is corrupted (and has not
> RAID to recover from), thus gluster should see the file as
> missing/corrupted and automatically trigger selfheal from other
> replicas ?
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list