[Gluster-users] Regression caused to gfapi applications with enabling client-io-threads by default

[Soumya Koduri]

On 10/05/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com
> <mailto:skoduri at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     With http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15051/
>     <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15051/>, performace/client-io-threads
>     is enabled by default. But with that we see regression caused to
>     nfs-ganesha application trying to un/re-export any glusterfs volume.
>     This shall be the same case with any gfapi application using
>     glfs_fini().
>
>     More details and the RCA can be found at [1].
>
>     In short, iot-worker threads spawned  (when the above option is
>     enabled) are not cleaned up as part of io-threads-xlator->fini() and
>     those threads could end up accessing invalid/freed memory post
>     glfs_fini().
>
>     The actual fix is to address io-threads-xlator->fini() to cleanup
>     those threads before exiting. But since those threads' IDs are
>     currently not stored, the fix could be very intricate and take a
>     while. So till then to avoid all existing applications crash, I
>     suggest to keep this option disabled by default and update this
>     known_issue with enabling this option in the release-notes.
>
>     I sent a patch to revert the commit -
>     http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15616/
>     <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15616/> [2]
>
>
> Good catch! I think the correct fix would be to make sure all threads
> die as part of PARENT_DOWN then?

 From my understanding, I think these threads should be cleaned up as 
part of xlator->fini().I am not sure if it needs to be handled even for 
PARENT_DOWN as well. Do we re-spawn the threads as part of PARENT_UP then?

Till that part gets fixed, can we make this option back to off by 
default to avoid the regressions with master and release-3.9 branch?

Thanks,
Soumya

>
>
>     Comments/Suggestions are welcome.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Soumya
>
>     [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380619#c11
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380619#c11>
>     [2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15616/
>     <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15616/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith