[Gluster-users] How to distributed with a folder

[jin deng]

if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data
unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.

2016年11月17日星期四，jin deng <cheneydeng88 at gmail.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cheneydeng88 at gmail.com');>> 写道：

>
>
> 2016年11月17日星期四，李立 <dylan-lili at foxmail.com> 写道：
>
>> In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different
>> bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data
>> will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to
>> avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable.
>>
>
>  I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which
> inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht)
> instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates
> the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your
> purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> DengJin
>
>

-- 
Thanks,
DengJin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20161117/fc1e8aae/attachment.html>