[Gluster-users] Comparison with other SDS

[Gandalf Corvotempesta]

2016-11-14 12:51 GMT+01:00 Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com>:
> Of course if you're running a replica <n> volume, non-dispersed you should
> only need to do lookups locally. It would be interesting to know if thats a
> optimization gluster does.

I have a replica 2 with only 2 bricks, there is nothing to "disperse" :)
Probably, Lizard is faster because replication is made by each
chunkserver and not by the client
http://moosefs.org/tl_files/mfs_folder/write862.png
(image for MooseFS, but Lizard is a fork, it replicate in the same way)