[Gluster-users] to RAID or not?

Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com
Mon Jul 4 17:46:27 UTC 2016


2016-07-04 19:44 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
<gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com>:
> So, any disk failure would me at least 6TB to be recovered via
> network. This mean an high network utilization and as long gluster
> doesn't have a dedicated network for replica,
> this can slow down client access.

Additionally, using a RAID-0 doesn't give any fault tollerance.
My question was for archieving the bast redundancy and data proction
available. If I have to use RAID-0 that doesn't protect data, why not
removing raid at all ?


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list