[Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

Joe Julian joe at julianfamily.org
Mon Aug 8 22:23:25 UTC 2016



On 08/08/2016 02:37 PM, David Gossage wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org 
> <mailto:joe at julianfamily.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote:
>>     So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I
>>     am of course looking for what to break next.
>>
>>     Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil
>>     on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I
>>     may need with a 3 way replica.  I was going to one by one change
>>     them to basically raid10 letting it heal in between.
>>
>>     Is best way to do that a systemctl stop glusterd, should I just
>>     kill the brick process to simulate a brick dying, or is their an
>>     actual brick maintenance command?
>
>     Just kill (-15) the brick process. That'll close the TCP
>     connections and the clients will just go right on functioning off
>     the remaining replica. When you format and recreate your
>     filesystem, it'll be missing the volume-id extended attributes so
>     to start it you'll need to force it:
>
>        gluster volume start $volname start force
>
>
> If I left volume started when brick process is killed and clients are 
> still (in theory) connected to volume wouldn't that just give me an 
> error that volume is already started?
>

No, it will just force-start the missing brick.

>
> Likely I would shut down the volume and do downtime for this anyway 
> though letting heals go on with VM's off.
>
>
>>
>>     If /etc/glusterfs is unchanged and /var/lib/glusterd is unchanged
>>     will doing a heal full after reboot or restarting glusterd take
>>     care of everything if I recreate the expected brick path first?
>
>     Once started, perform a full heal to re-replicate.
>
>>
>>     Are the improvements in 3.8 for sharding significant enough I
>>     should first look at updating to 3.8.2 when released in few days?
>
>     Yes.
>
>>
>>
>>     */David Gossage/*/*
>>     */
>>     //*Carousel Checks Inc.| System Administrator*
>>     *Office*708.613.2284
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gluster-users mailing list
>>     Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>>     http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>     <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>     _______________________________________________ Gluster-users
>     mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org
>     <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>     http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>     <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160808/77fba65b/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list