[Gluster-users] ec heal questions
Ashish Pandey
aspandey at redhat.com
Mon Aug 8 10:56:30 UTC 2016
Hi,
Considering all the other factor same for both the configuration, yes small configuration
would take less time. To read good copies, it will take less time.
I think, multi threaded shd is the only enhancement in near future.
Ashish
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serkan Çoban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com>
To: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions
Hi,
Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a
broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which
case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with
ec configuration?
Assume we are in 16+4 ec configuration. When heal starts it reads 16
chunks from other bricks recompute our chunks and writes it to just
replaced disk. Am I correct?
If above assumption is true then small ec configurations heals faster right?
Is there any improvements in 3.7.14+ that makes ec heal faster?(Other
than multi-thread shd for ec)
Thanks,
Serkan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160808/460449d3/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list