[Gluster-users] Geo-Rep. 3.5.3, Missing Files, Incorrect "Files Pending"
David Gibbons
david.c.gibbons at gmail.com
Tue May 5 02:19:41 UTC 2015
So I should do a compare out-of-band from Gluster and see what is
actually in-sync vs out of sync? Is there any easy way just to start
it over? I am assuming removing and re-adding geo-rep is the easiest
way. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Dave
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Aravinda <avishwan at redhat.com> wrote:
> Status output has issue showing exact number of files in sync. Please check
> the numbers on disk and let us know if difference exists between Master and
> Secondary Volume.
>
> --
> regards
> Aravinda
>
> On 05/05/2015 06:58 AM, David Gibbons wrote:
>>
>> I am having an issue with geo-replication. There were a number of
>> complications when I upgraded to 3.5.3, but geo-replication was (I
>> think) working at some point. The volume is accessed via samba using
>> vfs_glusterfs.
>>
>> The main issue is that geo-replication has not been sending updated
>> copies of old files to the replicated server. So in the scenario where
>> file created -> time passes -> file is modified -> file is saved, the
>> new version is not replicated.
>>
>> Is it possible that one brick is having a geo-rep issue and the others
>> are not? Consider this output:
>>
>> MASTER NODE MASTER VOL MASTER BRICK
>> SLAVE STATUS CHECKPOINT STATUS CRAWL
>> STATUS FILES SYNCD FILES PENDING BYTES PENDING DELETES
>> PENDING FILES SKIPPED
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> gfs-a-1 shares
>> /mnt/a-1-shares-brick-1/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2309456 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-1 shares
>> /mnt/a-1-shares-brick-2/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2315557 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-1 shares
>> /mnt/a-1-shares-brick-3/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2362884 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-1 shares
>> /mnt/a-1-shares-brick-4/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2407600 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-2 shares
>> /mnt/a-2-shares-brick-1/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2409430 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-2 shares
>> /mnt/a-2-shares-brick-2/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2308969 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-2 shares
>> /mnt/a-2-shares-brick-3/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2079576 8191 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-2 shares
>> /mnt/a-2-shares-brick-4/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Active
>> N/A Hybrid Crawl 2340597 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-3 shares
>> /mnt/a-3-shares-brick-1/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-3 shares
>> /mnt/a-3-shares-brick-2/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-3 shares
>> /mnt/a-3-shares-brick-3/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-3 shares
>> /mnt/a-3-shares-brick-4/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-4 shares
>> /mnt/a-4-shares-brick-1/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-4 shares
>> /mnt/a-4-shares-brick-2/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-4 shares
>> /mnt/a-4-shares-brick-3/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>> gfs-a-4 shares
>> /mnt/a-4-shares-brick-4/brick gfs-a-bkp::bkpshares Passive
>> N/A N/A 0 0 0
>> 0 0
>>
>> This seems to show that there are 8191 files_pending on just one
>> brick, and the others are up to date. I am suspicious of the 8191
>> number because it's looks like we're at a bucket-size boundary on the
>> backend. I've tried stopping and re-starting the rep session. I've
>> also tried changing the change_detector from xsync to changelog.
>> Neither seems to have had an effect.
>>
>> It seems like geo-replication is quite wonky in 3.5.x. Is there light
>> at the end of the tunnel, or should I find another solution to
>> replicate?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list