[Gluster-users] Self-heal doesn't appear to be happening

Sun Mar 15 18:23:35 UTC 2015

A couple more notes:

I should explicitly mention that I did make a very minor change (touched a file) inside datastore1.img while duchess was offline, so I know that there were at least a few bits that would've need to be resynced across the cluster after it rejoined.

Also, the reason I'm so paranoid about this is that this is actually the second time I've configured this particular cluster, because the first time it all went down in flames (along with about 6 months of work on some VMs) after I rebooted the Gluster boxes, in series, and apparently didn't wait long enough between reboots (or confirm that the self-heal process completed first).  So now I'm doing my due diligence on this.

Thanks again.

Regards,

Jon Heese

________________________________
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org <gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org> on behalf of Jonathan Heese <jheese at inetu.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 2:16 PM
To: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: [Gluster-users] Self-heal doesn't appear to be happening

Hello all,

I have a 2 node 2 brick replicate gluster volume that I'm having trouble making fault tolerant (a seemingly basic feature!) under CentOS 6.6 using EPEL packages.

Both nodes are as close to identical hardware and software as possible, and I'm running the following packages:

glusterfs-rdma-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64
glusterfs-3.6.2-1.el6.x86_64

They both have dual-port Mellanox 20Gbps InfiniBand cards with a straight (i.e. "crossover") cable and opensm to facilitate the RDMA transport between them.

Here are some data dumps to set the stage (and yes, the output of these commands looks the same on both nodes):

[root at duchess ~]# gluster volume info

Volume Name: gluster_disk
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: b1279e22-8589-407b-8671-3760f42e93e4
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: rdma
Bricks:
Brick1: duke-ib:/bricks/brick1
Brick2: duchess-ib:/bricks/brick1

[root at duchess ~]# gluster volume status
Status of volume: gluster_disk
Gluster process                                         Port    Online  Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick duke-ib:/bricks/brick1                            49153   Y       9594
Brick duchess-ib:/bricks/brick1                         49153   Y       9583
NFS Server on localhost                                 2049    Y       9590
Self-heal Daemon on localhost                           N/A     Y       9597
NFS Server on 10.10.10.1                                2049    Y       9607
Self-heal Daemon on 10.10.10.1                          N/A     Y       9614

Task Status of Volume gluster_disk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume tasks

[root at duchess ~]# gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 1

Hostname: 10.10.10.1
Uuid: aca56ec5-94bb-4bb0-8a9e-b3d134bbfe7b
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)

So before putting any real data on these guys (the data will eventually be a handful of large image files backing an iSCSI target via tgtd for ESXi datastores), I wanted to simulate the failure of one of the nodes. So I stopped glusterfsd and glusterd on duchess, waited about 5 minutes, then started them back up again, tail'ing /var/log/glusterfs/* and /var/log/messages. I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking for, but the logs quieted down after just a minute or so of restarting the daemons. I didn't see much indicating that self-healing was going on.

Every now and then (and seemingly more often than not), when I run "gluster volume heal gluster_disk info", I get no output from the command, and the following dumps into my /var/log/messages:

Mar 15 13:59:16 duchess kernel: glfsheal[10365]: segfault at 7ff56068d020 ip 00007ff54f366d80 sp 00007ff54e22adf8 error 6 in libmthca-rdmav2.so[7ff54f365000+7000]
Mar 15 13:59:17 duchess abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2015-03-15-13:59:16-10359' creation detected
Mar 15 13:59:17 duchess abrt[10368]: Saved core dump of pid 10359 (/usr/sbin/glfsheal) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2015-03-15-13:59:16-10359 (225595392 bytes)
Mar 15 13:59:25 duchess abrtd: Package 'glusterfs-server' isn't signed with proper key
Mar 15 13:59:25 duchess abrtd: 'post-create' on '/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2015-03-15-13:59:16-10359' exited with 1
Mar 15 13:59:25 duchess abrtd: Deleting problem directory '/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2015-03-15-13:59:16-10359'

Other times, when I'm lucky, I get messages from the "heal info" command indicating that datastore1.img (the file that I intentionally changed while duchess was offline) is in need of healing:

[root at duke ~]# gluster volume heal gluster_disk info
Brick duke.jonheese.local:/bricks/brick1/
/datastore1.img - Possibly undergoing heal

Number of entries: 1

Brick duchess.jonheese.local:/bricks/brick1/
/datastore1.img - Possibly undergoing heal

Number of entries: 1

But watching df on the bricks and tailing glustershd.log doesn't seem to indicate that anything is actually happening -- and df indicates that brick on duke *is* different in file size from the brick on duchess. It's been over an hour now, and I'm not confident that the selfheal functionality is even working at all... Nor do I know how to do anything about it!

Also, I find it a little bit troubling that I'm using the aliases (in /etc/hosts on both servers) duke-ib and duchess-ib for the gluster node configuration, but the "heal info" command refers to my nodes with their internal FQDNs, which resolve to their 1Gbps interface IPs... That doesn't mean that they're trying to communicate over those interfaces (the volume is configured with "transport rdma", as you can see above), does it?

Can anyone throw out any ideas on how I can:

1. Determine whether this is intentional behavior (or a bug?),

2. Determine whether my data has been properly resync'd across the bricks, and

3. Make it work correctly if not.

Thanks in advance!

Regards,

Jon Heese
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150315/2500d482/attachment.html>