[Gluster-users] Poor performance of NFS client for large writes compared to native client
Vijay Bellur
vbellur at redhat.com
Thu Apr 30 10:44:11 UTC 2015
On 04/30/2015 06:49 AM, Behrooz Shafiee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was comparing GlusterFS native and NFS clients and I noticed, NFS
> client is significantly slower for large writes. I wrote about 200, 1GB
> files using a 1MB block sizes and NFS throughput was almost half of
> native client. Can anyone explain why is that?
>
Depending on where the file gets scheduled, NFS might need an additional
network hop. That can contribute to additional latency and less
throughput than the native client.
-Vijay
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list