[Gluster-users] CentOS 7: Gluster Test Framework testcases failure
Kiran Patil
kirantpatil at gmail.com
Sat Sep 27 12:35:06 UTC 2014
Testcase tests/bugs/bug-913555.t does not show the peers and please find
the details at http://ur1.ca/i8ybk (http://fpaste.org/136968/)
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Kiran Patil <kirantpatil at gmail.com> wrote:
> Now on XFS, the Test Summary Report is same as running on ZFS except test
> case bug-953887.t failure.
>
> Test case tests/bugs/bug-953887.t expects force at end of line, TEST
> gluster volume add-brick $V0 $H0:$B0/${V0}{2,3} and it passed once force is
> substituted at the end of the line.
>
> Test case tests/bugs/bug-767095.t failed due to path issue and now it no
> more fails.
>
> So the failures are no more specific to on disk filesystems such as ZFS
> and XFS but glusterfs.
>
> Thanks,
> Kiran.
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kiran Patil <kirantpatil at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I ran each testcases with DEBUG=1 and pasted at http://ur1.ca/i8xay (
>> http://fpaste.org/136940/)
>>
>> This time I ran the testcases by keeping default paths and now
>> tests/bugs/bug-861542.t passes
>>
>> Need to create /var/run/gluster directory on reboot
>>
>> Test Setup:
>> ---------------------
>> CentOS 7 : 3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
>>
>> gluster --version : glusterfs 3.4.5 built on Jul 24 2014 19:14:13
>>
>> Zfs : zfs-0.6.3
>>
>> glusterfs testcases version :
>> git branch : * (detached from v3.4.5)
>>
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-802417.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39
>> Failed: 2)
>> Failed tests: 28, 31
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21
>> Failed: 1)
>> Failed test: 15
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-908146.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10
>> Failed: 2)
>> Failed tests: 8-9
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-913555.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11
>> Failed: 4)
>> Failed tests: 4-6, 9
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19
>> Failed: 8)
>> Failed tests: 5-7, 9, 11, 13-15
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-force.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35
>> Failed: 6)
>> Failed tests: 29-31, 33-35
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-mode-script.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35
>> Failed: 6)
>> Failed tests: 29-31, 33-35
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23
>> Failed: 2)
>> Failed tests: 19, 23
>> Files=123, Tests=2019, 4834 wallclock secs ( 1.62 usr 0.25 sys + 258.83
>> cusr 201.05 csys = 461.75 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kiran.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/26/2014 02:59 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/09/2014, at 9:28 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Have we published somewhere which distributions or OS versions we are
>>>>> running regression tests ? if not lets compile it and publish as this will
>>>>> help community to understand which os distributions are part of the
>>>>> regression testing.
>>>>>
>>>> The best we have so far is probably this:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.
>>>> php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do we have plans to run regression on a variety of distributions? Not
>>>>> sure how difficult or complex it is to maintain.
>>>>>
>>>> The primary OS at the moment is CentOS 6.x (mainly due to it
>>>> being the primary OS for GlusterFS I think).
>>>>
>>>> Manu and Harsha have been going through the regression tests
>>>> recently, making them more cross platform in order to run on
>>>> the BSDs.
>>>>
>>>> This effort has also highlighted some interesting Linux
>>>> specific behaviour in the main GlusterFS code base, and led
>>>> to fixes there.
>>>>
>>>> In short, we're all for running the regression tests on as
>>>> many distributions as possible. If Community members want
>>>> to put VM's or something online (medium-long term), I'd be
>>>> happy to hook our Jenkins infrastructure up to them to
>>>> automatically run tests on them.
>>>>
>>>> Is that kind of what you're asking? :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yup, I will try to get a CentOS 7 instance for running regression tests
>>> :)
>>>
>>> -Lala
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140927/5463684c/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list