[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] "Official" word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?

[Joe Julian]

Which means, of course, no redundancy until that self heal is completed. 

Furthermore, "replace-brick start" stopped working at all some versions ago so the removal of start and stop may as well just happen.

On October 30, 2014 12:41:17 AM PDT, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
>'replace-brick commit force' is still going to be available. It's just
>that data-migration for replace-brick is going to be removed. So
>'replace-brick (start|stop)' are going to be deprecated.
>
>To replace a brick in a replica set, you'll need to do a
>'replace-brick commit force'. Self-healing will take care of filling
>the new brick with data.
>
>~kaushal
>
>On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, B.K.Raghuram <bkrram at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is
>"officially"
>> deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of
>just
>> one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that
>new
>> bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always
>> available..
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Ram
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-devel mailing list
>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141030/e1bf6a24/attachment.html>