[Gluster-users] Jumbo frames

[Ben Turner]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Liverman" <gliverma at westga.edu>
> To: "Jean R. Franco" <jfranco at maila.net.br>
> Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:22:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Jumbo frames
> 
> 
> 
> Personally, I think all replication benefits from a 9000 MTU. Bigger frame
> equals faster replication.

Yep, setting jumbo frames one of the easiest and biggest perf gains you can tune with glusterfs.  I don't have any data handy for 1GB NICs but here is something on 10G:

http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/england-rhs-performance.pdf

-b
 
> --
> Gene Liverman
> Systems Administrator
> Information Technology Services
> University of West Georgia
> gliverma at westga.edu
> 
> 
> ITS: Making Technology Work for You!
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately by return mail, delete this message, and destroy any copies. Any
> dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended
> recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal or actionable by law.
> On Oct 21, 2014 6:26 AM, "Jean R. Franco" < jfranco at maila.net.br > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> We're using Huawei's S5300 manageable switches in our deployment.
> Would we benefit from higher size jumbo frames?
> Right now it's set at 1600.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Jean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users