[Gluster-users] write performance is not good
Dan Mons
dmons at cuttingedge.com.au
Tue Jan 28 08:56:41 UTC 2014
Is your write single or multi-threaded?
If it's single threaded, try writing your files across as many threads
as possible, and see what the performance improvement is like.
-Dan
----------------
Dan Mons
Skunk Works
Cutting Edge
http://cuttingedge.com.au
On 28 January 2014 18:49, Mingfan Lu <mingfan.lu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a distributed and replica=3 volume (not to use stripe ) in a
> cluster. I used dd to write 120 files to test. I foundthe write performane
> of some files are much lower than others. all these "BAD" files are stored
> in the same three brick servers for replication (I called node1 node2 node3)
>
> e.g the bad write performance could be 10MBps while good performance could
> be 150Mbps+
>
> there are no problems about raid and networks.
> If i stopped node1 & node2, the write performance of "BAD" files are the
> similar to (even better) GOOD ones.
>
> One thing I must metion is the raids of node1 and node2 are reformated for
> some reason, there are many self-heal activities to restore files in node1
> and node2.
> Is the BAD write performance caused by aggresive self-heal?
> How could I slow down the self-heal?
> Any advise?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list