[Gluster-users] Problems to work with mounted directory in Gluster 3.2.7 -> switch to 3.2.4 ; -)
Targino Silveira
targinosilveira at gmail.com
Wed Feb 19 19:32:53 UTC 2014
Sure,
I will use XFS, as I sayd before it's for old data, so we don't need a
great performance, we only need to store data.
regards,
Targino Silveira
+55-85-8626-7297
www.twitter.com/targinosilveira
2014-02-19 16:11 GMT-03:00 BGM <bernhard.glomm at ecologic.eu>:
> well, note:
> - you don't need zfs on the hardeware machines, xfs or ext3 or ext4 would
> do it too
> - for production you wouldn't use a glusterfs on top of a glusterfs but
> rather giving the vm access to a real blockdevice, like a whole harddisk or
> at least a partition of it although migration of the vm wouldn't be
> possible than...
> therefor: a VM as a glusterserver might not be the best idea.
> - remember to peer probe the glusterserver partner from both sides! as
> mentioned below
>
> for a first setup you should be fine with that.
>
> regards
>
> On 19.02.2014, at 19:32, Targino Silveira <targinosilveira at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Bernhard I will do this.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Targino Silveira
> +55-85-8626-7297
> www.twitter.com/targinosilveira
>
>
> 2014-02-19 14:43 GMT-03:00 Bernhard Glomm <bernhard.glomm at ecologic.eu>:
>
>> I would strongly recommend to restart fresh with gluster 3.2.4 from
>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/
>> It works totally fine for me.
>> (reinstall the vms as slim as possible if you can.)
>>
>> As a quick howto consider this:
>>
>> - We have 2 Hardware machines (just desktop machines for dev-env)
>> - both running zol
>> - create a zpool and zfs filesystem
>> - create a gluster replica 2 volume between hostA and hostB
>> - installe 3 VM vmachine0{4,5,6}
>> - vmachine0{4,5} each have a 100GB diskimage file as /dev/vdb which also
>> resides on the glustervolume
>> - create ext3 filesystem on vmachine0{4,5}:/dev/vdb1
>> - create gluster replica 2 between vmachine04 and vmachine05 as shown
>> below
>>
>> (!!!obviously nobody would do that in any serious environment,
>> just to show that even a setup like that _would_ be possible!!!)
>>
>> - run some benchmarks on that volume and compare the results to other
>>
>> So:
>>
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # mkdir -p /srv/vdb1/gf_brick
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # mount /dev/vdb1 /srv/vdb1/
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # gluster peer probe vmachine05
>> peer probe: success
>>
>> # now switch over to vmachine05 and do
>>
>> root at vmachine05[/1]:~ # mkdir -p /srv/vdb1/gf_brick
>> root at vmachine05[/1]:~ # mount /dev/vdb1 /srv/vdb1/
>> root at vmachine05[/1]:~ # gluster peer probe vmachine04
>> peer probe: success
>> root at vmachine05[/1]:~ # gluster peer probe vmachine04
>> peer probe: success: host vmachine04 port 24007 already in peer list
>>
>> # the peer probe from BOTH sides ist often forgotten
>> # switch back to vmachine04 and continue with
>>
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # gluster peer status
>> Number of Peers: 1
>>
>> Hostname: vmachine05
>> Port: 24007
>> Uuid: 085a1489-dabf-40bb-90c1-fbfe66539953
>> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # gluster volume info layer_cake_volume
>>
>> Volume Name: layer_cake_volume
>> Type: Replicate
>> Volume ID: ef5299db-2896-4631-a2a8-d0082c1b25be
>> Status: Started
>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
>> Transport-type: tcp
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: vmachine04:/srv/vdb1/gf_brick
>> Brick2: vmachine05:/srv/vdb1/gf_brick
>> root at vmachine04[/0]:~ # gluster volume status layer_cake_volume
>> Status of volume: layer_cake_volume
>> Gluster process Port Online
>> Pid
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Brick vmachine04:/srv/vdb1/gf_brick 49152 Y
>> 12778
>> Brick vmachine05:/srv/vdb1/gf_brick 49152 Y
>> 16307
>> NFS Server on localhost 2049 Y
>> 12790
>> Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A Y
>> 12791
>> NFS Server on vmachine05 2049 Y
>> 16320
>> Self-heal Daemon on vmachine05 N/A Y
>> 16319
>>
>> There are no active volume tasks
>>
>> # set any option you might like
>>
>> root at vmachine04[/1]:~ # gluster volume set layer_cake_volume
>> network.remote-dio enable
>> volume set: success
>>
>> # go to vmachine06 and mount the volume
>> root at vmachine06[/1]:~ # mkdir /srv/layer_cake
>> root at vmachine06[/1]:~ # mount -t glusterfs -o
>> backupvolfile-server=vmachine05 vmachine04:/layer_cake_volume
>> /srv/layer_cake
>> root at vmachine06[/1]:~ # mount
>> vmachine04:/layer_cake_volume on /srv/layer_cake type fuse.glusterfs
>> (rw,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072)
>> root at vmachine06[/1]:~ # df -h
>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> ...
>> vmachine04:/layer_cake_volume 97G 188M 92G 1% /srv/layer_cake
>>
>> All fine and stable
>>
>>
>>
>> # now let's see how it tastes
>> # note this is postmark on / NOT on the glustermounted layer_cake_volume!
>> # that postmark results might be available tomorrow ;-)))
>> root at vmachine06[/1]:~ # postmark
>> PostMark v1.51 : 8/14/01
>> pm>set transactions 500000
>> pm>set number 200000
>> pm>set subdirectories 10000
>> pm>run
>> Creating subdirectories...Done
>> Creating files...Done
>> Performing transactions..........Done
>> Deleting files...Done
>> Deleting subdirectories...Done
>> Time:
>> 2314 seconds total
>> 2214 seconds of transactions (225 per second)
>> Files:
>> 450096 created (194 per second)
>> Creation alone: 200000 files (4166 per second)
>> Mixed with transactions: 250096 files (112 per second)
>> 249584 read (112 per second)
>> 250081 appended (112 per second)
>> 450096 deleted (194 per second)
>> Deletion alone: 200192 files (3849 per second)
>> Mixed with transactions: 249904 files (112 per second)
>>
>> Data:
>> 1456.29 megabytes read (644.44 kilobytes per second)
>> 2715.89 megabytes written (1.17 megabytes per second)
>>
>> # reference
>> # running postmark on the hardware machine directly on zfs
>> #
>> # /test # postmark
>> # PostMark v1.51 : 8/14/01
>> # pm>set transactions 500000
>> # pm>set number 200000
>> # pm>set subdirectories 10000
>> # pm>run
>> # Creating subdirectories...Done
>> # Creating files...Done
>> # Performing transactions..........Done
>> # Deleting files...Done
>> # Deleting subdirectories...Done
>> # Time:
>> # 605 seconds total
>> # 549 seconds of transactions (910 per second)
>> #
>> # Files:
>> # 450096 created (743 per second)
>> # Creation alone: 200000 files (4255 per second)
>> # Mixed with transactions: 250096 files (455 per second)
>> # 249584 read (454 per second)
>> # 250081 appended (455 per second)
>> # 450096 deleted (743 per second)
>> # Deletion alone: 200192 files (22243 per second)
>> # Mixed with transactions: 249904 files (455 per second)
>> #
>> # Data:
>> # 1456.29 megabytes read (2.41 megabytes per second)
>> # 2715.89 megabytes written (4.49 megabytes per second)
>>
>> dbench -D /srv/layer_cake 5
>>
>> Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
>> ----------------------------------------
>> NTCreateX 195815 5.159 333.296
>> Close 143870 0.793 93.619
>> Rename 8310 10.922 123.096
>> Unlink 39525 2.428 203.753
>> Qpathinfo 177736 2.551 220.605
>> Qfileinfo 31030 2.057 175.565
>> Qfsinfo 32545 1.393 174.045
>> Sfileinfo 15967 2.691 129.028
>> Find 68664 9.629 185.739
>> WriteX 96860 0.841 108.863
>> ReadX 307834 0.511 213.602
>> LockX 642 1.511 10.578
>> UnlockX 642 1.541 10.137
>> Flush 13712 12.853 405.383
>>
>> Throughput 10.1832 MB/sec 5 clients 5 procs max_latency=405.405 ms
>>
>>
>> # reference
>> dbench -D /tmp 5
>> # reference
>> dbench -D /tmp 5
>>
>> Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
>> ----------------------------------------
>> NTCreateX 3817455 0.119 499.847
>> Close 2804160 0.005 16.000
>> Rename 161655 0.322 459.790
>> Unlink 770906 0.556 762.314
>> Deltree 92 20.647 81.619
>> Mkdir 46 0.003 0.012
>> Qpathinfo 3460227 0.017 18.388
>> Qfileinfo 606258 0.003 11.652
>> Qfsinfo 634444 0.006 14.976
>> Sfileinfo 310990 0.155 604.585
>> Find 1337732 0.056 18.466
>> WriteX 1902611 0.245 503.604
>> ReadX 5984135 0.008 16.154
>> LockX 12430 0.008 9.111
>> UnlockX 12430 0.004 4.551
>> Flush 267557 4.505 902.093
>>
>> Throughput 199.664 MB/sec 5 clients 5 procs max_latency=902.099 ms
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140219/242011de/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list