[Gluster-users] glusterfs poor performance for my local machine (host and client on the same machine)

[lei yang]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Marcus Bointon
<marcus at synchromedia.co.uk>wrote:

> On 27 Nov 2013, at 09:30, lei yang <yanglei.fage at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a machine which have 5 hard disk
>
> I want to use glusterfs to fast my disk
>
>
> You do know that gluster is not about single-node performance? You'll get
> far better performance by using RAID 0/1/5/10 on your local machine.
> Gluster gives you multiple machine redundancy (like RAID, but spread across
> multiple machines), and size scalability beyond what you can fit in one box.
>
> root at ovpovp-S2600CP:/mnt/lyang0# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1000M count=10 of=./1G
> 10+0 records in
> 10+0 records out
> 10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 55.5562 s, 189 MB/s
>
>
> From a single node that looks reasonable for gluster. You'd probably get
> 3-4 times that with native local access.
>
>

but the truth is it's much worse than use my native harddisk, that's is why
I post my question, any setting is wrong with me ?


Lei


> Marcus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131128/1845a3e6/attachment.html>