[Gluster-users] 40 gig ethernet

[Stephan von Krawczynski]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:13:53 -0700
Bryan Whitehead <driver at megahappy.net> wrote:

> I'm using 40G Infiniband with IPoIB for gluster. Here are some ping
> times (from host 172.16.1.10):
> 
> [root at node0.cloud ~]# ping -c 10 172.16.1.11
> PING 172.16.1.11 (172.16.1.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.093 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.113 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.125 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.125 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.125 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.198 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.194 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.1.11: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.115 ms
> 
> --- 172.16.1.11 ping statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.093/0.142/0.198/0.035 ms

What you like to say is that there is no significant difference compared to
GigE, right?
Anyone got a ping between two kvm-qemu virtio-net cards at hand?

-- 
Regards,
Stephan