[Gluster-users] Which version to upgrade to?

[Nguyen Viet Cuong]

Hi Andrew,

The package you pointed out contains libraries only, no glusterd service
(/usr/sbin/glusterd).

Cuong


On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Andrew Neuschwander <
andrew.neuschwander at nih.gov> wrote:

> Vijay,
>
> Thanks, I will starting testing 3.4.1. for our upgrade target.
>
> Diep,
>
> Gluster wasn't included in CentOS 6.4, but it has been included in the
> CentOS 6.5 base:
>
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/Packages/
> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>
> -Andrew
>
>
> On 12/27/2013 4:32 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>> On 12/27/2013 07:03 AM, Diep Pham Van wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/27/2013 05:05 AM, Andrew Neuschwander wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6 from the CentOS Base 6.5 repository or
>>>> 3.4.1-3.el6 from the glusterfs-epel repository?
>>>>
>>> I asked the same question in the past.
>>> There is no server package in the Base repo.
>>>
>>>
>> Client packages with rhs in the version are best used with server
>> packages that have rhs in the version. The server packages are not part of
>> RHEL/CentOS. If you are looking to upgrade from 3.3.1, it would be better
>> to use 3.4.1 from gluster.org.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vijay
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>



-- 
Nguyen Viet Cuong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131229/21cafd14/attachment.html>