[Gluster-users] Bricks suggestions
Brian Candler
B.Candler at pobox.com
Sun Apr 29 21:18:40 UTC 2012
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:25:30PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> I'm also considering no raid at all.
>
> For example, with 2 server and 8 SATA disk each, I can create a single
> XFS filesystem for every disk and then creating a replicated bricks for
> each.
>
> For example:
>
> server1:brick1 => server2:brick1
>
> server1:brick2 => server2:brick2
>
> and so on.
>
> After that, I can use these bricks to create a distributed volume.
>
> In case of a disk failure, I have to heal only on disk at time and not
> the whole volume, right?
Yes. I considered that too. What you have to weigh it up against is the
management overhead:
- recognising a failed disk
- replacing a failed disk (which involves creating a new XFS filesystem
and mounting it at the right place)
- forcing a self-heal
Whereas detecting a failed RAID disk is straightforward, and so is swapping
it out.
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list