[Gluster-users] linux raid0 vs gluster raid0

[Jeremy Enos]

  Hardware being best, what's better between software and gluster?

On 9/23/2010 10:55 PM, Craig Carl wrote:
> Jeremy -
>    The absolute best would be hardware RAID. If that isn't an option 
> mdadm (linux) is your better choice.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> --
> Craig Carl
> Sales Engineer; Gluster, Inc.
> Cell - (408) 829-9953 <about:blank> (California, USA)
> Office - (408) 770-1884 <about:blank>
> Gtalk - craig.carl at gmail.com
> Twitter - @gluster
> Installing Gluster Storage Platform, the movie! 
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/GlusterStorage>
> http://rackerhacker.com/2010/08/11/one-month-with-glusterfs-in-production/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Jeremy Enos" <jenos at ncsa.uiuc.edu>
> *To: *gluster-users at gluster.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:13:25 PM
> *Subject: *[Gluster-users] linux raid0 vs gluster raid0
>
>   Suppose I've got 5 disks in a system connected to my IB network, and I
> want to host a Gluster filesystem on it for max I/O  (large block,
> multiple client).
> Should I raid0 the 5 disks at the linux level, or the gluster level?
> thx-
>
>      Jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users