[Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
Artem Trunov
datamove at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 12:41:39 UTC 2010
Hi, Raghavendra, Jeremy
Thanks, I have tried with the patch and also with ofed 1.5.2 and got
pretty much what Jeremy had:
[2010-12-10 13:32:59.69007] E [rdma.c:2047:rdma_create_cq]
rpc-transport/rdma: max_mr_size = 18446744073709551615, max_cq =
65408, max_cqe = 131071, max_mr = 131056
Aren't these parameters configurable on some driver level? I am a bit
new to the IB business, so don't know...
How do you suggest to proceed? To try the unaccepted patch?
cheers
Artem.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at gluster.com> wrote:
> Hi Artem,
>
> you can check the maximum limits using the patch I had sent earlier in the same thread. Also, the patch
> http://patches.gluster.com/patch/5844/ (which is not accepted yet), will check for whether the number of cqe being passed in ibv_creation_cq is greater than the value allowed by the device and if so, it will try to create CQ with maximum limit allowed by the device.
>
> regards,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Artem Trunov" <datamove at gmail.com>
> To: "Raghavendra G" <raghavendra at gluster.com>
> Cc: "Jeremy Stout" <stout.jeremy at gmail.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 7:13:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>
> Hi, Ravendra, Jeremy
>
> This was very interesting debugging thread to me, since I have the
> same symptoms, but unsure of the origin. Please see log for my mount
> command at the end of the message.
>
> I have installed 3.3.1. My OFED is 1.5.1 - does it make serious
> difference between already mentioned 1.5.2?
>
> On hardware limitations - I have Mellanox InfiniHost III Lx 20Gb/s and
> it says in specs:
>
> "Supports 16 million QPs, EEs & CQs "
>
> Is this enough? How can I query for actual settings on max_cq, max_cqe?
>
> In general, how should I proceed? What are my other debugging options?
> Should I try to go Jeremy path with hacking the gluster code?
>
> cheers
> Artem.
>
> Log:
>
> ---------
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.847595] W [io-stats.c:1644:init] test-volume:
> dangling volume. check volfile
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.847643] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.847657] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.858574] E [rdma.c:2066:rdma_create_cq]
> rpc-transport/rdma: test-volume-client-1: creation of send_cq failed
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.858805] E [rdma.c:3771:rdma_get_device]
> rpc-transport/rdma: test-volume-client-1: could not create CQ
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.858821] E [rdma.c:3957:rdma_init]
> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.858893] E [rdma.c:4789:init]
> test-volume-client-1: Failed to initialize IB Device
> [2010-12-09 15:15:53.858909] E
> [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load] rpc-transport: 'rdma'
> initialization failed
> pending frames:
>
> patchset: v3.1.1
> signal received: 11
> time of crash: 2010-12-09 15:15:53
> configuration details:
> argp 1
> backtrace 1
> dlfcn 1
> fdatasync 1
> libpthread 1
> llistxattr 1
> setfsid 1
> spinlock 1
> epoll.h 1
> xattr.h 1
> st_atim.tv_nsec 1
> package-string: glusterfs 3.1.1
> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x32aca302d0]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(strcmp+0x0)[0x32aca79140]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/rpc-transport/rdma.so[0x2aaaac4fef6c]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/rpc-transport/rdma.so(init+0x2f)[0x2aaaac50013f]
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_transport_load+0x389)[0x3fcca0cac9]
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_new+0xfe)[0x3fcca1053e]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/xlator/protocol/client.so(client_init_rpc+0xa1)[0x2aaaab194f01]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/xlator/protocol/client.so(init+0x129)[0x2aaaab1950d9]
> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(xlator_init+0x58)[0x3fcc617398]
> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(glusterfs_graph_init+0x31)[0x3fcc640291]
> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(glusterfs_graph_activate+0x38)[0x3fcc6403c8]
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs(glusterfs_process_volfp+0xfa)[0x40373a]
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs(mgmt_getspec_cbk+0xc5)[0x406125]
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_handle_reply+0xa2)[0x3fcca0f542]
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x8d)[0x3fcca0f73d]
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_transport_notify+0x2c)[0x3fcca0a95c]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/rpc-transport/socket.so(socket_event_poll_in+0x3f)[0x2aaaaad6ef9f]
> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.1.1/rpc-transport/socket.so(socket_event_handler+0x170)[0x2aaaaad6f130]
> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0[0x3fcc637917]
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs(main+0x39b)[0x40470b]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x32aca1d994]
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs[0x402e29]
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at gluster.com> wrote:
>> From the logs its evident that the reason for completion queue creation failure is that the number of completion queue elements (in a completion queue) we had requested in ibv_create_cq, (1024 * send_count) is less than the maximum supported by the ib hardware (max_cqe = 131071).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeremy Stout" <stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>> To: "Raghavendra G" <raghavendra at gluster.com>
>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
>> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 4:20:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>>
>> I patched the source code and rebuilt GlusterFS. Here are the full logs:
>> Server:
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.945804] I [glusterd.c:275:init] management: Using
>> /etc/glusterd as working directory
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.947692] E [rdma.c:2047:rdma_create_cq]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: max_mr_size = 18446744073709551615, max_cq =
>> 65408, max_cqe = 131071, max_mr = 131056
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953226] E [rdma.c:2079:rdma_create_cq]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: rdma.management: creation of send_cq failed
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953509] E [rdma.c:3785:rdma_get_device]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: rdma.management: could not create CQ
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953582] E [rdma.c:3971:rdma_init]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953668] E [rdma.c:4803:init] rdma.management:
>> Failed to initialize IB Device
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953691] E
>> [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load] rpc-transport: 'rdma'
>> initialization failed
>> [2010-12-03 07:08:55.953780] I [glusterd.c:96:glusterd_uuid_init]
>> glusterd: generated UUID: 4eb47ca7-227c-49c4-97bd-25ac177b2f6a
>> Given volfile:
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 1: volume management
>> 2: type mgmt/glusterd
>> 3: option working-directory /etc/glusterd
>> 4: option transport-type socket,rdma
>> 5: option transport.socket.keepalive-time 10
>> 6: option transport.socket.keepalive-interval 2
>> 7: end-volume
>> 8:
>>
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.244790] I
>> [glusterd-handler.c:785:glusterd_handle_create_volume] glusterd:
>> Received create volume req
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.247646] I [glusterd-utils.c:232:glusterd_lock]
>> glusterd: Cluster lock held by 4eb47ca7-227c-49c4-97bd-25ac177b2f6a
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.247678] I
>> [glusterd-handler.c:2835:glusterd_op_txn_begin] glusterd: Acquired
>> local lock
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.247708] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1091:glusterd3_1_cluster_lock] glusterd: Sent lock
>> req to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.248038] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1233:glusterd3_1_stage_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>> to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.251970] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1323:glusterd3_1_commit_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>> to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.252020] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1145:glusterd3_1_cluster_unlock] glusterd: Sent
>> unlock req to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:10.252036] I
>> [glusterd-op-sm.c:4738:glusterd_op_txn_complete] glusterd: Cleared
>> local lock
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.11649] I
>> [glusterd-handler.c:936:glusterd_handle_cli_start_volume] glusterd:
>> Received start vol reqfor volume testdir
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.11724] I [glusterd-utils.c:232:glusterd_lock]
>> glusterd: Cluster lock held by 4eb47ca7-227c-49c4-97bd-25ac177b2f6a
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.11734] I
>> [glusterd-handler.c:2835:glusterd_op_txn_begin] glusterd: Acquired
>> local lock
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.11761] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1091:glusterd3_1_cluster_lock] glusterd: Sent lock
>> req to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.12120] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1233:glusterd3_1_stage_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>> to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.184403] I
>> [glusterd-utils.c:971:glusterd_volume_start_glusterfs] : About to
>> start glusterfs for brick pgh-submit-1:/mnt/gluster
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.229143] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1323:glusterd3_1_commit_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>> to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.229198] I
>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1145:glusterd3_1_cluster_unlock] glusterd: Sent
>> unlock req to 0 peers
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.229218] I
>> [glusterd-op-sm.c:4738:glusterd_op_txn_complete] glusterd: Cleared
>> local lock
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:22.240157] I
>> [glusterd-pmap.c:281:pmap_registry_remove] pmap: removing brick (null)
>> on port 24009
>>
>>
>> Client:
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.82784] W [io-stats.c:1644:init] testdir: dangling
>> volume. check volfile
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.82824] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.82836] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.85980] E [rdma.c:2047:rdma_create_cq]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: max_mr_size = 18446744073709551615, max_cq =
>> 65408, max_cqe = 131071, max_mr = 131056
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.92883] E [rdma.c:2079:rdma_create_cq]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: creation of send_cq failed
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.93156] E [rdma.c:3785:rdma_get_device]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: could not create CQ
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.93224] E [rdma.c:3971:rdma_init]
>> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.93313] E [rdma.c:4803:init] testdir-client-0:
>> Failed to initialize IB Device
>> [2010-12-03 07:09:00.93332] E [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load]
>> rpc-transport: 'rdma' initialization failed
>> Given volfile:
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 1: volume testdir-client-0
>> 2: type protocol/client
>> 3: option remote-host submit-1
>> 4: option remote-subvolume /mnt/gluster
>> 5: option transport-type rdma
>> 6: end-volume
>> 7:
>> 8: volume testdir-write-behind
>> 9: type performance/write-behind
>> 10: subvolumes testdir-client-0
>> 11: end-volume
>> 12:
>> 13: volume testdir-read-ahead
>> 14: type performance/read-ahead
>> 15: subvolumes testdir-write-behind
>> 16: end-volume
>> 17:
>> 18: volume testdir-io-cache
>> 19: type performance/io-cache
>> 20: subvolumes testdir-read-ahead
>> 21: end-volume
>> 22:
>> 23: volume testdir-quick-read
>> 24: type performance/quick-read
>> 25: subvolumes testdir-io-cache
>> 26: end-volume
>> 27:
>> 28: volume testdir-stat-prefetch
>> 29: type performance/stat-prefetch
>> 30: subvolumes testdir-quick-read
>> 31: end-volume
>> 32:
>> 33: volume testdir
>> 34: type debug/io-stats
>> 35: subvolumes testdir-stat-prefetch
>> 36: end-volume
>>
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at gluster.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Can you apply the attached patch, rebuild and start glusterfs? Please make sure to send us the logs of glusterfs.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Jeremy Stout" <stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 6:38:00 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>>>
>>> I'm currently using OFED 1.5.2.
>>>
>>> For the sake of testing, I just compiled GlusterFS 3.1.1 from source,
>>> without any modifications, on two systems that have a 2.6.33.7 kernel
>>> and OFED 1.5.2 built from source. Here are the results:
>>>
>>> Server:
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:55.886563] I
>>> [glusterd-handler.c:936:glusterd_handle_cli_start_volume] glusterd:
>>> Received start vol reqfor volume testdir
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:55.886597] I [glusterd-utils.c:232:glusterd_lock]
>>> glusterd: Cluster lock held by 7dd23af5-277e-4ea1-a495-2a9d882287ec
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:55.886607] I
>>> [glusterd-handler.c:2835:glusterd_op_txn_begin] glusterd: Acquired
>>> local lock
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:55.886628] I
>>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1091:glusterd3_1_cluster_lock] glusterd: Sent lock
>>> req to 0 peers
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:55.887031] I
>>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1233:glusterd3_1_stage_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>>> to 0 peers
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:56.60427] I
>>> [glusterd-utils.c:971:glusterd_volume_start_glusterfs] : About to
>>> start glusterfs for brick submit-1:/mnt/gluster
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:56.104896] I
>>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1323:glusterd3_1_commit_op] glusterd: Sent op req
>>> to 0 peers
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:56.104935] I
>>> [glusterd3_1-mops.c:1145:glusterd3_1_cluster_unlock] glusterd: Sent
>>> unlock req to 0 peers
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:56.104953] I
>>> [glusterd-op-sm.c:4738:glusterd_op_txn_complete] glusterd: Cleared
>>> local lock
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:56.114764] I
>>> [glusterd-pmap.c:281:pmap_registry_remove] pmap: removing brick (null)
>>> on port 24009
>>>
>>> Client:
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.503395] W [io-stats.c:1644:init] testdir:
>>> dangling volume. check volfile
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.503434] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.503447] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict: @data=(nil)
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.543409] E [rdma.c:2066:rdma_create_cq]
>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: creation of send_cq failed
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.543660] E [rdma.c:3771:rdma_get_device]
>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: could not create CQ
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.543725] E [rdma.c:3957:rdma_init]
>>> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.543812] E [rdma.c:4789:init] testdir-client-0:
>>> Failed to initialize IB Device
>>> [2010-12-02 21:17:25.543830] E
>>> [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load] rpc-transport: 'rdma'
>>> initialization failed
>>>
>>> Thank you for the help so far.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Craig Carl <craig at gluster.com> wrote:
>>>> Jeremy -
>>>> What version of OFED are you running? Would you mind install version 1.5.2
>>>> from source? We have seen this resolve several issues of this type.
>>>> http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/OFED/ofed-1.5.2/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> -->
>>>> Craig Carl
>>>> Senior Systems Engineer
>>>> Gluster
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Jeremy Stout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> An another follow-up, I tested several compilations today with
>>>>> different values for send/receive count. I found the maximum value I
>>>>> could use for both variables was 127. With a value of 127, GlusterFS
>>>>> did not produce any errors. However, when I changed the value back to
>>>>> 128, the RDMA errors appeared again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also tried setting soft/hard "memlock" to unlimited in the
>>>>> limits.conf file, but still ran into RDMA errors on the client side
>>>>> when the count variables were set to 128.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Jeremy Stout<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for the response. I've been testing GlusterFS 3.1.1 on two
>>>>>> different OpenSUSE 11.3 systems. Since both systems generated the same
>>>>>> error messages, I'll include the output for both.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System #1:
>>>>>> fs-1:~ # cat /proc/meminfo
>>>>>> MemTotal: 16468756 kB
>>>>>> MemFree: 16126680 kB
>>>>>> Buffers: 15680 kB
>>>>>> Cached: 155860 kB
>>>>>> SwapCached: 0 kB
>>>>>> Active: 65228 kB
>>>>>> Inactive: 123100 kB
>>>>>> Active(anon): 18632 kB
>>>>>> Inactive(anon): 48 kB
>>>>>> Active(file): 46596 kB
>>>>>> Inactive(file): 123052 kB
>>>>>> Unevictable: 1988 kB
>>>>>> Mlocked: 1988 kB
>>>>>> SwapTotal: 0 kB
>>>>>> SwapFree: 0 kB
>>>>>> Dirty: 30072 kB
>>>>>> Writeback: 4 kB
>>>>>> AnonPages: 18780 kB
>>>>>> Mapped: 12136 kB
>>>>>> Shmem: 220 kB
>>>>>> Slab: 39592 kB
>>>>>> SReclaimable: 13108 kB
>>>>>> SUnreclaim: 26484 kB
>>>>>> KernelStack: 2360 kB
>>>>>> PageTables: 2036 kB
>>>>>> NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
>>>>>> Bounce: 0 kB
>>>>>> WritebackTmp: 0 kB
>>>>>> CommitLimit: 8234376 kB
>>>>>> Committed_AS: 107304 kB
>>>>>> VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
>>>>>> VmallocUsed: 314316 kB
>>>>>> VmallocChunk: 34349860776 kB
>>>>>> HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
>>>>>> HugePages_Total: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Free: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Surp: 0
>>>>>> Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
>>>>>> DirectMap4k: 9856 kB
>>>>>> DirectMap2M: 3135488 kB
>>>>>> DirectMap1G: 13631488 kB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fs-1:~ # uname -a
>>>>>> Linux fs-1 2.6.32.25-November2010 #2 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 1 15:19:55
>>>>>> EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fs-1:~ # ulimit -l
>>>>>> 64
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System #2:
>>>>>> submit-1:~ # cat /proc/meminfo
>>>>>> MemTotal: 16470424 kB
>>>>>> MemFree: 16197292 kB
>>>>>> Buffers: 11788 kB
>>>>>> Cached: 85492 kB
>>>>>> SwapCached: 0 kB
>>>>>> Active: 39120 kB
>>>>>> Inactive: 76548 kB
>>>>>> Active(anon): 18532 kB
>>>>>> Inactive(anon): 48 kB
>>>>>> Active(file): 20588 kB
>>>>>> Inactive(file): 76500 kB
>>>>>> Unevictable: 0 kB
>>>>>> Mlocked: 0 kB
>>>>>> SwapTotal: 67100656 kB
>>>>>> SwapFree: 67100656 kB
>>>>>> Dirty: 24 kB
>>>>>> Writeback: 0 kB
>>>>>> AnonPages: 18408 kB
>>>>>> Mapped: 11644 kB
>>>>>> Shmem: 184 kB
>>>>>> Slab: 34000 kB
>>>>>> SReclaimable: 8512 kB
>>>>>> SUnreclaim: 25488 kB
>>>>>> KernelStack: 2160 kB
>>>>>> PageTables: 1952 kB
>>>>>> NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
>>>>>> Bounce: 0 kB
>>>>>> WritebackTmp: 0 kB
>>>>>> CommitLimit: 75335868 kB
>>>>>> Committed_AS: 105620 kB
>>>>>> VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
>>>>>> VmallocUsed: 76416 kB
>>>>>> VmallocChunk: 34359652640 kB
>>>>>> HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
>>>>>> HugePages_Total: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Free: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Rsvd: 0
>>>>>> HugePages_Surp: 0
>>>>>> Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
>>>>>> DirectMap4k: 7488 kB
>>>>>> DirectMap2M: 16769024 kB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> submit-1:~ # uname -a
>>>>>> Linux submit-1 2.6.33.7-November2010 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 8 13:49:00
>>>>>> EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>> submit-1:~ # ulimit -l
>>>>>> 64
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I retrieved the memory information on each machine after starting the
>>>>>> glusterd process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Raghavendra G<raghavendra at gluster.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can you also get the output of,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #uname -a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #ulimit -l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Raghavendra G"<raghavendra at gluster.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Jeremy Stout"<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:20:04 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In order to diagnoise why completion queue creation is failing (as
>>>>>>> indicated by logs), we want to know what was the free memory available in
>>>>>>> your system when glusterfs was started.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Raghavendra G"<raghavendra at gluster.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Jeremy Stout"<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:11:18 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, there might be some performance decrease. But, it should not affect
>>>>>>> working of rdma.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Jeremy Stout"<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:30:20 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] RDMA Problems with GlusterFS 3.1.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As an update to my situation, I think I have GlusterFS 3.1.1 working
>>>>>>> now. I was able to create and mount RDMA volumes without any errors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To fix the problem, I had to make the following changes on lines 3562
>>>>>>> and 3563 in rdma.c:
>>>>>>> options->send_count = 32;
>>>>>>> options->recv_count = 32;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The values were set to 128.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll run some tests tomorrow to verify that it is working correctly.
>>>>>>> Assuming it does, what would be the expected side-effect of changing
>>>>>>> the values from 128 to 32? Will there be a decrease in performance?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Jeremy Stout<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here are the results of the test:
>>>>>>>> submit-1:/usr/local/glusterfs/3.1.1/var/log/glusterfs #
>>>>>>>> ibv_srq_pingpong
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000406, PSN 0x703b96, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000407, PSN 0x618cc8, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000408, PSN 0xd62272, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000409, PSN 0x5db5d9, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040a, PSN 0xc51978, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040b, PSN 0x05fd7a, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040c, PSN 0xaa4a51, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040d, PSN 0xb7a676, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040e, PSN 0x56bde2, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040f, PSN 0xa662bc, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000410, PSN 0xee27b0, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000411, PSN 0x89c683, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000412, PSN 0xd025b3, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000413, PSN 0xcec8e4, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000414, PSN 0x37e5d2, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000415, PSN 0x29562e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000406, PSN 0x3b644e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000407, PSN 0x173320, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000408, PSN 0xc105ea, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000409, PSN 0x5e5ff1, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040a, PSN 0xff15b0, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040b, PSN 0xf0b152, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040c, PSN 0x4ced49, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040d, PSN 0x01da0e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040e, PSN 0x69459a, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040f, PSN 0x197c14, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000410, PSN 0xd50228, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000411, PSN 0xbc9b9b, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000412, PSN 0x0870eb, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000413, PSN 0xfb1fbc, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000414, PSN 0x3eefca, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000415, PSN 0xbd64c6, GID ::
>>>>>>>> 8192000 bytes in 0.01 seconds = 5917.47 Mbit/sec
>>>>>>>> 1000 iters in 0.01 seconds = 11.07 usec/iter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> fs-1:/usr/local/glusterfs/3.1.1/var/log/glusterfs # ibv_srq_pingpong
>>>>>>>> submit-1
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000406, PSN 0x3b644e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000407, PSN 0x173320, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000408, PSN 0xc105ea, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000409, PSN 0x5e5ff1, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040a, PSN 0xff15b0, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040b, PSN 0xf0b152, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040c, PSN 0x4ced49, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040d, PSN 0x01da0e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040e, PSN 0x69459a, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x00040f, PSN 0x197c14, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000410, PSN 0xd50228, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000411, PSN 0xbc9b9b, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000412, PSN 0x0870eb, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000413, PSN 0xfb1fbc, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000414, PSN 0x3eefca, GID ::
>>>>>>>> local address: LID 0x000b, QPN 0x000415, PSN 0xbd64c6, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000406, PSN 0x703b96, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000407, PSN 0x618cc8, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000408, PSN 0xd62272, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000409, PSN 0x5db5d9, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040a, PSN 0xc51978, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040b, PSN 0x05fd7a, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040c, PSN 0xaa4a51, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040d, PSN 0xb7a676, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040e, PSN 0x56bde2, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x00040f, PSN 0xa662bc, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000410, PSN 0xee27b0, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000411, PSN 0x89c683, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000412, PSN 0xd025b3, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000413, PSN 0xcec8e4, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000414, PSN 0x37e5d2, GID ::
>>>>>>>> remote address: LID 0x0002, QPN 0x000415, PSN 0x29562e, GID ::
>>>>>>>> 8192000 bytes in 0.01 seconds = 7423.65 Mbit/sec
>>>>>>>> 1000 iters in 0.01 seconds = 8.83 usec/iter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Based on the output, I believe it ran correctly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Anand Avati<anand.avati at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you verify that ibv_srq_pingpong works from the server where this
>>>>>>>>> log
>>>>>>>>> file is from?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Avati
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Stout<stout.jeremy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whenever I try to start or mount a GlusterFS 3.1.1 volume that uses
>>>>>>>>>> RDMA, I'm seeing the following error messages in the log file on the
>>>>>>>>>> server:
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.51270] I [nfs.c:652:init] nfs: NFS service
>>>>>>>>>> started
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.51362] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict:
>>>>>>>>>> @data=(nil)
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.51375] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict:
>>>>>>>>>> @data=(nil)
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.59628] E [rdma.c:2066:rdma_create_cq]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: creation of send_cq failed
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.59851] E [rdma.c:3771:rdma_get_device]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: could not create CQ
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.59925] E [rdma.c:3957:rdma_init]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.60009] E [rdma.c:4789:init] testdir-client-0:
>>>>>>>>>> Failed to initialize IB Device
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:37:53.60030] E
>>>>>>>>>> [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport: 'rdma' initialization failed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On the client, I see:
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.653469] W [io-stats.c:1644:init] testdir:
>>>>>>>>>> dangling volume. check volfile
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.653573] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict:
>>>>>>>>>> @data=(nil)
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.653607] W [dict.c:1204:data_to_str] dict:
>>>>>>>>>> @data=(nil)
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.736275] E [rdma.c:2066:rdma_create_cq]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: creation of send_cq failed
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.736651] E [rdma.c:3771:rdma_get_device]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: testdir-client-0: could not create CQ
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.736689] E [rdma.c:3957:rdma_init]
>>>>>>>>>> rpc-transport/rdma: could not create rdma device for mthca0
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.736805] E [rdma.c:4789:init] testdir-client-0:
>>>>>>>>>> Failed to initialize IB Device
>>>>>>>>>> [2010-11-30 18:43:49.736841] E
>>>>>>>>>> [rpc-transport.c:971:rpc_transport_load] rpc-transport: 'rdma'
>>>>>>>>>> initialization failed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This results in an unsuccessful mount.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I created the mount using the following commands:
>>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/glusterfs/3.1.1/sbin/gluster volume create testdir
>>>>>>>>>> transport rdma submit-1:/exports
>>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/glusterfs/3.1.1/sbin/gluster volume start testdir
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To mount the directory, I use:
>>>>>>>>>> mount -t glusterfs submit-1:/testdir /mnt/glusterfs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it is an Infiniband problem since GlusterFS 3.0.6 and
>>>>>>>>>> GlusterFS 3.1.0 worked on the same systems. For GlusterFS 3.1.0, the
>>>>>>>>>> commands listed above produced no error messages.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If anyone can provide help with debugging these error messages, it
>>>>>>>>>> would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list