[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS-1.4 to become GlusterFS-2.0

[Dan Parsons]

In my install of 1.4rc7, /sbin/mount.glusterfs is a simple shell  
script, and glusterfs is actually a symlink to glusterfsd. So, in  
short, I'd have to say that in 1.4rc7, yes, the client and server are  
one binary.


Dan Parsons


On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Kevan Benson wrote:

> Sean Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Kevan Benson  
>> <kbenson at a-1networks.com>wrote:
>>> Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:
>>>> 2.0.0rc1 will be available in a week. Before we call it 2.0.0, we  
>>>> want to
>>>> to achieve the following:
>>>> * Binary packages for GNU/Linux (rpm/deb), FreeBSD, Mac OS X and  
>>>> Solaris
>>>> (server)
>>> As for the RPM spec file, are you amenable to some alterations?   
>>> IMO it
>>> would be preferable to build three packages instead of one,
>>> glusterfs-common, glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server, following  
>>> the
>>> common way client/server packages are built in RHEL/CentOS.
>>>
>>> I remember Matt's spec file used to be this way, but it looks like  
>>> you
>>> guys specifically changed it:
>>>
>>> * Sat Apr 19 2008 Amar Tumballi <amar at zresearch.com> - 1.3.8pre6
>>> - Merged common, client and server packages into one package.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason for that?
>>>
>> Aren't client and server now one executable?  I think so.
>
> Nope.  At least not in 1.4rc7.
>
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs
> /usr/sbin/glusterfs
> /usr/sbin/glusterfsd
>
> -- 
>
> -Kevan Benson
> -A-1 Networks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>