[Gluster-users] performance lower then expected

[Michael Di Domenico]

Reads if i'm recalling correctly, are the same, I get 10MB/sec (im
travelling for work right now and can't retest, but i will when i get back)

I'm positive the workstations can do full 1Gb/sec, i've run several tests
between machines and they work fine.  I get 80-90MB/sec sustained

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Jason Haar <Jason.Haar at trimble.co.nz>wrote:

> Michael Di Domenico wrote:
> > No, write-behind is not enabled.
> >
> > The volume spec files are pretty much exactly the same as the ones on
> > the wiki page, all I changed was the directory.  (I can't post them as
> > i'm travelling at the moment)
>
> I can't help you out here, but I'm interested in the thread. How are
> your reads? Are they ~10MB/s or ~100MB/s?. i.e. are you seeing any
> aggregation  for reads?
>
> If not, put another Gb workstation on there and ensure you are actually
> getting Gb to that workstation. And check you're full duplex (cisco
> switches can smack you around the chops if you're unlucky ;-)
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jason Haar
> Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
> Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
> PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20081029/7c59bc53/attachment.html>