[Gluster-users] posix-locks question

[Anand Babu Periasamy]

It should be locks.
 > subvolumes locks brick-ns
--
Anand Babu Periasamy
GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31
Blog [http://ab.freeshell.org]
GlusterFS [http://www.gluster.org]
The GNU Operating System [http://www.gnu.org]



Deian Chepishev wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I read in the docs that in order to have posix-lock I have to load this 
> translator on the server side.
> 
> My question is, if for example the server config file is:
> 
> volume brick
>  type storage/posix
>  option directory /storage/gluster-export/data/
> end-volume
> 
> volume locks
>   type features/posix-locks
>   subvolumes brick
> end-volume
> 
> 
> volume brick-ns
>  type storage/posix
>  option directory /storage/gluster-export/ns
> end-volume
> 
> ### Add network serving capability to above brick.
> volume server
>  type protocol/server
>  option transport-type tcp/server     # For TCP/IP transport
>  subvolumes brick brick-ns
>  option auth.ip.brick.allow 10.1.124.*  # Allow access to "brick" volume
>  option auth.ip.brick-ns.allow 10.1.124.* # Allow access to "brick-ns" 
> volume
> end-volume
> 
> Which name should be listed for directive "subvolumes" in the volume 
> "server"
> should it be
> subvolumes bricks brick-ns
> or
> subvolumes locks brick-ns
> 
> Regards,
> Deian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users