[Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

Deepshikha Khandelwal dkhandel at redhat.com
Sat Jul 7 13:41:13 UTC 2018


Hi folks,

The issue[1] has been resolved. Now the softserve instance will be
having 2GB RAM i.e. same as that of the Jenkins builder's sizing
configurations.

[1] https://github.com/gluster/softserve/issues/40

Thanks,
Deepshikha Khandelwal

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri 6 Jul, 2018, 5:18 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal, <dkhandel at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Poornima/Karthik,
>>
>> We've looked into the memory error that this softserve instance have
>> showed up. These machine instances have 1GB RAM which is not in the
>> case with the Jenkins builder. It's 2GB RAM there.
>>
>> We've created the issue [1] and will solve it sooner.
>
> Great. Thanks for the update.
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/gluster/softserve/issues/40
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deepshikha Khandelwal
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Poornima for the analysis.
>> > Can someone work on fixing this please?
>> >
>> > ~Karthik
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:17 PM Poornima Gurusiddaiah
>> > <pgurusid at redhat.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The same test case is failing for my patch as well [1]. I requested for
>> >> a
>> >> regression system and tried to reproduce it.
>> >> From my analysis, the brick process (mutiplexed) is consuming a lot of
>> >> memory, and is being OOM killed. The regression has 1GB ram and the
>> >> process
>> >> is consuming more than 1GB. 1GB for 120 bricks is acceptable
>> >> considering
>> >> there is 1000 threads in that brick process.
>> >> Ways to fix:
>> >> - Increase the regression system RAM size OR
>> >> - Decrease the number of volumes in the test case.
>> >>
>> >> But what is strange is why the test passes sometimes for some patches.
>> >> There could be some bug/? in memory consumption.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Poornima
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya
>> >> <ksubrahm at redhat.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> $subject is failing on centos regression for most of the patches with
>> >>> timeout error.
>> >>>
>> >>> 07:32:34
>> >>>
>> >>> ================================================================================
>> >>> 07:32:34 [07:33:05] Running tests in file
>> >>> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t
>> >>> 07:32:34 Timeout set is 300, default 200
>> >>> 07:37:34 ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t timed out
>> >>> after 300 seconds
>> >>> 07:37:34 ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t: bad status
>> >>> 124
>> >>> 07:37:34
>> >>> 07:37:34        *********************************
>> >>> 07:37:34        *       REGRESSION FAILED       *
>> >>> 07:37:34        * Retrying failed tests in case *
>> >>> 07:37:34        * we got some spurious failures *
>> >>> 07:37:34        *********************************
>> >>> 07:37:34
>> >>> 07:42:34 ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t timed out
>> >>> after 300 seconds
>> >>> 07:42:34 End of test ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t
>> >>> 07:42:34
>> >>>
>> >>> ================================================================================
>> >>>
>> >>> Can anyone take a look?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Karthik
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> >>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> >>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-infra mailing list
>> > Gluster-infra at gluster.org
>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra


More information about the Gluster-infra mailing list