[Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] Dropping nightly build from download.gluster.org ?

[Michael Scherer]

Le vendredi 24 mars 2017 à 09:53 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit :
> On 03/24/2017 09:39 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:29:05PM -0400, Michael Scherer wrote:
> >> Another example:
> >> pub/gluster/glusterfs has various directory for versions of glusterfs,
> >> but also do have libvirt, vagrant and nfs-ganesha, who are not version,
> >> and might be rather served from a directory upstream (in fact,
> >> nfs-ganesha and glusterfs-coreutils are also on
> >> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/ )
> > 
> > A cleanup is much appreciated! Maybe come up with a proposed directory
> > structure and see from there what makes sense to keep or remove?
> > 
> 
> What does "from a directory upstream" mean? There is no upstream
> nfs-ganesha server

Indeed, I mean a directory up (ie, from '..'). I will plead jetlag and
lack of coffee.

> 
> There are versions of nfs-ganesha, even if there aren't very many, and
> thus not to the same level of granularity as gluster.
> 
> And .../pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha is merely a symlink to
> .../pub/gluster/nfs-ganesha — just a convenience. There are not two
> copies of it. Likewise for -coreutils and the others.
> 
> I'm not opposed reorganizing the directories, but I don't believe
> there's really anything wrong with it, per se, the way it is now.

Mhh, I didn't see this was symlink, so maybe that's a first issue with
my sync script.

I will recheck directory on the download server directly and try to give
more direct suggestions.

-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20170324/c7917ab1/attachment.sig>