[Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working

Michael Scherer mscherer at redhat.com
Mon Feb 29 16:36:27 UTC 2016


Le samedi 27 février 2016 à 21:17 +0530, Raghavendra Talur a écrit :
> On Feb 27, 2016 9:04 PM, "Amye Scavarda" <amye at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" <rtalur at redhat.com>
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look
> at
> > >>> > it.
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access.
> > >
> > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding
> misc
> > > hoping to catch his attention.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing?
> (When
> > >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in
> > >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put
> across
> > >> pros and cons for that.
> > >> Personally,
> > >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7
> > >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do
> so with
> > >> our current setup.)
> > >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we
> mean
> > >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in
> > >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Kaleb
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Gluster-infra mailing list
> > >>> Gluster-infra at gluster.org
> > >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-infra mailing list
> > > Gluster-infra at gluster.org
> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
> >
> > Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday.
> >
> > In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented
> > infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so
> > that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the
> > challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting
> > people to volunteer to assist is not helpful.
> >
> > The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way
> > do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em
> > coming.
> 
> +1 to everything.
> 
> Update : the site is working now. Not sure about who fixed it or what fixed
> it.

I did, once someone mentioned this was not working on a place where I
was looking (ie, the irc channel #gluster). It seems that indeed, after
last power cut, I didn't rejoin #gluster-dev from my 2nd irc client.
 
-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20160229/ada58a86/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gluster-infra mailing list