[Gluster-infra] Some gerrit email is getting "high" spam scores

Wed Feb 17 14:11:04 UTC 2016

Le mercredi 17 février 2016 à 08:13 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit :
> On 02/16/2016 04:47 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:11 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 08:03 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> e.g. 
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE) 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] <review at dev.gluster.org>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> (yes, two asterisks is not really very high, but it's what I have to set in my zimbra filter to catch the majority of the real spam.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there something we can do, e.g. add whatever missing headers are necessary or an PTR record for dev.gluster.org to gluster.org DNS somewhere, to yield lower scores?
> >>>
> >>> Yup, we can do that. I will ask IT as I do not have access.
> >>
> >> In fact, that's more complicated. 
> >>
> >> We have 1 IP address incoming (66.187.224.201), which is natted to the
> >> internal IP of the server, and we have 1 ip for outgoing connexion,
> >> which is shared (66.187.224.184). 
> > 
> > So rdns is done.
> > 
> > For missing_headers, there is this page:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MISSING_HEADERS
> > 
> > I am a bit puzzled about it. Could you look at a previous mail header to
> > see if something changed ?
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure what a previous mail header is, or would tell us.

My goal is more to see ff there was the same problem before the
migration.

>  Here are
> the headers from one of the mails that had a MISSING_HEADERS hit. As you
> can see it does not have a To: line. I guess Du really did only sent to CC:

Ok so maybe "gerrit bug". Let's hope that the rdns stuff do fix it
enough to not score above 2.0.

If not, I guess gerrit update would solve that, once we can do that.

> Is there somewhere I can set my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and adjust my
> score for MISSING_HEADERS?

On RH side, nope. Something that would help is the scoring used, so we
can see if MISSING_HEADERS is 0.1 or 1.9.

> From - Wed Feb 17 08:06:34 2016
> X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> X-Mozilla-Keys:
> Return-Path: review at dev.gluster.org^M
> Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO^M
>  zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by^M
>  zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016^M
>  21:50:44 -0500 (EST)^M
> Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
> (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])^M
>         by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
> id D79CE169703;^M
>         Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500 (EST)^M
> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
> [10.5.110.31])^M
>         by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4)
> with ESMTP id u1G2ohQA012057^M
>         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
> verify=NO);^M
>         Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500^M
> Received: from dev.gluster.org (unknown [66.187.224.184])^M
>         by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83BC0BBE51;^M
>         Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:50:41 +0000 (UTC)^M
> Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])^M
>         by dev.gluster.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2046505F2;^M
>         Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800 (PST)^M
> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800^M
> From: "Raghavendra G (Code Review)" <review at dev.gluster.org>^M
> CC: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.com>,^M
>         NetBSD Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>,^M
>         Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>,^M
>         Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com>,^M
>         Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna <vmallika at redhat.com>,^M
>         soumya k <skoduri at redhat.com>^M
> Reply-To: rgowdapp at redhat.com^M
> X-Gerrit-MessageType: comment^M
> List-Id: <gerrit-glusterfs.review.gluster.org>^M
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://review.gluster.org/settings>^M
> Subject: Change in glusterfs[master]: performance/write-behind:
> guaranteed retry after a short write^M
> X-Gerrit-Change-Id: I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9^M
> X-Gerrit-ChangeURL: <http://review.gluster.org/13438>^M
> X-Gerrit-Commit: db8849a6285334aab502e1be9bd5dc876eaf89c3^M
> In-Reply-To:
> <gerrit.1455278893107.I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9 at review.gluster.org>^M
> References:
> <gerrit.1455278893107.I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9 at review.gluster.org>^M
> MIME-Version: 1.0^M
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8^M
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M
> Content-Disposition: inline^M
> User-Agent: Gerrit/2.9.4^M
> Message-Id: <20160216024643.E2046505F2 at dev.gluster.org>^M
> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE)
> 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184]
> <review at dev.gluster.org>^M
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24^M
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.31^M
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20160217/0d4cd166/attachment.sig>