[Gluster-infra] separating code analysis from download

Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeithle at redhat.com
Thu Nov 5 12:13:16 UTC 2015

Hash: SHA256

On 11/05/2015 07:08 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 novembre 2015 à 12:44 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit :
>> [fixed CC to gluster-devel at gluster.org]
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 06:13:52AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
>>> <top post> How about devel.gluster.org? Or upload.gluster.org?
>>> Either one would be reasonable for nightly coverity/clang/etc
>>> reports as well as community uploads?
>>> </top post>
>> devel.gluster.org sounds good to me. We will use it for
>> uploading, but also downloading, unless the uploads get
>> replicated to download.gluster.org and we use that as the only
>> public accessible download system.
> I am ok with that, but there is a risk of confusion with 
> dev.gluster.org :)

That's just another name for review.gluster.org, right?  I'm not sure
why we need two names.

>> The nightly builds used to get uploaded to download.gluster.org
>> too. A replacement system (+user) for that needs to accept scp
>> from build.gluster.org and be able to download the built packages
>> from Fedora COPR (was using an lftp script for that).
> I didn't think about this.
> I would like to have it separate from the main download, so we
> could at least avoid polluting the download stats ( since they were
> "skewed" by some mirrors downloading all nightlies in the past ),
> and since we can afford to lose the nightlies, IIRC.
> But now, it depend on why do we use them, and what for.

More information about the Gluster-infra mailing list