[Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] Gluster and GCC 5.1
Niels de Vos
ndevos at redhat.com
Mon Jun 29 20:25:58 UTC 2015
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
> > On 06/29/2015 11:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> >> On 06/29/2015 02:04 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
> >>> Reading through gcc docs I could see that with gcc v5, it
> >>> defaults to C99 semantics and compiling with -fgnu89-inline
> >>> solves the above issue. I'm wondering how glusterfs compiled
> >>> successfully without providing this flag.
> >> Well, it didn't originally.
> >> Most of the bugs were fixed before Fedora 22 arrived with gcc-5.
> I didn't say all of them had been fixed. ;-)
> >> E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs,
> >> and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22.
> > Immediately after the Fedora 22 release, we had a similar issue
> > reported from a user with gcc v5 and was fixed through .
> Yes, there were still some, and/or some had crept (back) in, when
> Fedora22 was released.
> I think we're still finding some more. Not all of the developers are
> using Fedora 22 yet. I know a few that are still on Fedora 19!
> Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora 22 VM to
> Jenkins to catch these. I don't think anything ever happened though.
I'm waiting for the new Jenkins slaves to become available... We should
try to not exceed the Rackspace budget too much.
More information about the Gluster-infra