[Gluster-infra] [Gluster-devel] Possibility to move our Jenkins setup to the CentOS Jenkins infra

Michael Scherer mscherer at redhat.com
Mon Feb 9 10:54:57 UTC 2015


Le lundi 02 février 2015 à 22:14 +0100, Lalatendu Mohanty a écrit :
> On 02/02/2015 12:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:43:39AM -0500, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > One of the things which has been a fair drag for the developer part of
> > > the Gluster Community, is maintaining our own Jenkins infrastructure.
> > > 
> > > When chatting with the CentOS guys (pre-FOSDEM) the other day, there is
> > > the possibility we could use their Jenkins infrastructure instead.
> > > 
> > > They have a *bunch* of physical nodes (100+), and several other projects
> > > are using it as well (Ceph, and others).
> > > 
> > > This would potentially make things easier for us, and they're not limited
> > > to running things on CentOS either.  They already have FreeBSD nodes,
> > > and don't foresee problems with getting NetBSD up and running.
> > > 
> > > At the moment, I'm kind of having the opinion this could be a good
> > > way forward, and we should probably try out our smoke/regression scripting
> > > on their setup to see if it's workable.
> > > 
> > > And if it turns out to be, then great, and we migrate all of our jenkins
> > > there then decommission ours (including the master. :)
> > > 
> > > What do people reckon?
> > Sounds good to me in general. Is there a document that describes their
> > Jenkins setupi (like provisioning of the slaves)? Note that we do not
> > (yet) have a way of automated multi-host tests in Jenkins, but that
> > should be looked into one day.  Also, is it possible for Gluster
> > Community members to log into a Jenkins slave and troubleshoot specific
> > failures?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Niels
> 
> +1. We just need to make sure, CentOS would give required access to
> gluster community members even if they are not doing anything in
> CentOS community.

Do we have any kind of centralized auth for them ?
( as it seems to be the first step to that, IMHO )
-- 
Michael Scherer
Open Source and Standards, Sysadmin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20150209/bec5b3ac/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gluster-infra mailing list