[Gluster-infra] License page is wrong on the web site
Niels de Vos
ndevos at redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 10:03:33 UTC 2014
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:56:32AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 17/09/2014, at 10:54 AM, Humble Chirammal wrote:
> > Isnt it better to have component name "infrastructure" than "website"?, so that
> > we can track all the infrastructure issues under the same component ?
> > just a thought here.
> Not a bad idea. "website" is probably clearer / more-obvious for external
> people reporting bugs though.
> Maybe we need two components. "website" and "project-infrastructure" ;)
Or a component 'infrastructure' with an optional sub-component
'website', and maybe additional sub-components when something needs a
More information about the Gluster-infra