[Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Expected tagging on April 10th

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Status: Tagging pending
>
> Waiting on patches:
> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579


The regression doesn't pass for the mainline patch. I believe master is
broken now. With latest master sdfs-sanity.t always fail. We either need to
fix it or mark it as bad test.

root at a5f81bd447c2:/home/glusterfs# prove -vf tests/basic/sdfs-sanity.t
tests/basic/sdfs-sanity.t ..
1..7
ok 1, LINENUM:8
ok 2, LINENUM:9
ok 3, LINENUM:11
ok 4, LINENUM:12
ok 5, LINENUM:13
ok 6, LINENUM:16
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/mnt/glusterfs/1/coverage’: Invalid argument
stat: cannot stat '/mnt/glusterfs/1/coverage/dir': Invalid argument
tests/basic/rpc-coverage.sh: line 61: test: ==: unary operator expected
not ok 7 , LINENUM:20
FAILED COMMAND: tests/basic/rpc-coverage.sh /mnt/glusterfs/1
Failed 1/7 subtests

Test Summary Report
-------------------
tests/basic/sdfs-sanity.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  7
Files=1, Tests=7, 14 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.58 cusr  0.67
csys =  1.27 CPU)
Result: FAIL


>
> Following patches will not be taken in if CentOS regression does not
> pass by tomorrow morning Eastern TZ,
> (Pranith/KingLongMee) - cluster-syncop: avoid duplicate unlock of
> inodelk/entrylk
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22385
> (Aravinda) - geo-rep: IPv6 support
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22488
> (Aravinda) - geo-rep: fix integer config validation
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22489
>
> Tracker bug status:
> (Ravi) - Bug 1693155 - Excessive AFR messages from gluster showing in
> RHGSWA.
>   All patches are merged, but none of the patches adds the "Fixes"
> keyword, assume this is an oversight and that the bug is fixed in this
> release.
>
> (Atin) - Bug 1698131 - multiple glusterfsd processes being launched for
> the same brick, causing transport endpoint not connected
>   No work has occurred post logs upload to bug, restart of bircks and
> possibly glusterd is the existing workaround when the bug is hit. Moving
> this out of the tracker for 6.1.
>
> (Xavi) - Bug 1699917 - I/O error on writes to a disperse volume when
> replace-brick is executed
>   Very recent bug (15th April), does not seem to have any critical data
> corruption or service availability issues, planning on not waiting for
> the fix in 6.1
>
> - Shyam
> On 4/6/19 4:38 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi Mohit,
> >
> > https://review.gluster.org/22495 should get into 6.1 as it’s a
> > regression. Can you please attach the respective bug to the tracker Ravi
> > pointed out?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 12:00, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com
> > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Tracker bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692394,
> in
> >     case anyone wants to add blocker bugs.
> >
> >
> >     On 05/04/19 8:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >     > Hi,
> >     >
> >     > Expected tagging date for release-6.1 is on April, 10th, 2019.
> >     >
> >     > Please ensure required patches are backported and also are passing
> >     > regressions and are appropriately reviewed for easy merging and
> >     tagging
> >     > on the date.
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Shyam
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Gluster-devel mailing list
> >     > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >     > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Gluster-devel mailing list
> >     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >     https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Atin (atinm)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20190416/e51d21b0/attachment.html>