[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)
Nithya Balachandran
nbalacha at redhat.com
Thu Oct 11 14:34:38 UTC 2018
On 11 October 2018 at 18:30, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> > <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the
> > first release for the same. They were added in as part of bugs, and
> > hence looking at github issues to track them as enhancements did not
> > catch the same.
> >
> > We need to document it in the release notes (and also the gluster
> doc.
> > site ideally), and hence I would like a some details on what to write
> > for the same (or release notes commits) for them.
> >
> > Option: cluster.daemon-log-level
> > Attention: @atin
> > Review: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20442
> >
> >
> > This option has to be used based on extreme need basis and this is why
> > it has been mentioned as GLOBAL_NO_DOC. So ideally this shouldn't be
> > documented.
> >
> > Do we still want to capture it in the release notes?
>
> This is an interesting catch-22, when we want users to use the option
> (say to provide better logs for troubleshooting), we have nothing to
> point to, and it would be instructions (repeated over the course of
> time) over mails.
>
> I would look at adding this into an options section in the docs, but the
> best I can find in there is
> https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/
> Managing%20Volumes/
>
> I would say we need to improve the way we deal with options and the
> required submissions around the same.
>
> No argument there. I will take a look and get back on what we can improve
in the docs.
> Thoughts?
>
> >
> > <https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20442>
> >
> > Option: ctime-invalidation
> > Attention: @Du
> > Review: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20286
> >
> > Option: shard-lru-limit
> > Attention: @krutika
> > Review: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20544
> >
> > Option: shard-deletion-rate
> > Attention: @krutika
> > Review: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/19970
> >
> > Please send in the required text ASAP, as we are almost towards the
> end
> > of the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shyam
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20181011/05631304/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list