[Gluster-devel] Problems about cache virtual glusterfs ACLs for ganesha in md-cache
rgowdapp at redhat.com
Thu Oct 11 02:40:10 UTC 2018
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:47 AM Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Cc nfs-ganesha,
> Md-cache has option "cache-posix-acl" that controls caching of posix ACLs
> ("system.posix_acl_access"/"system.posix_acl_default") and virtual
> glusterfs ACLs
> ("glusterfs.posix.acl"/"glusterfs.posix.default_acl") now.
Not sure how virtual xattrs are consumed or who generates them. +Raghavendra
Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> +Thottan, Jiffin <jthottan at redhat.com> - acl
> But, _posix_xattr_get_set does not fill virtual glusterfs ACLs when lookup
> So, md-cache caches bad virtual glusterfs ACLs.
> After I turn on "cache-posix-acl" option to cache ACLs at md-cache, nfs
> client gets many EIO errors.
> There are two chooses for cache virtual glusterfs ACLs in md-cache,
> 1. Cache it separately as posix ACLs (a new option maybe
> "cache-glusterfs-acl" is added);
> And make sure _posix_xattr_get_set fills them when lookup requests.
> 2. Does not cache it, only cache posix ACLs;
> If gfapi request it, md-cache lookup according posix ACL at cache,
> if exist, make the virtual glusterfs ACL locally and return to gfapi;
> otherwise, send the request to glusterfsd.
> Virtual glusterfs ACLs are another format of posix ACLs, there are larger
> than posix ACLs,
> and always exist no matter the really posix ACL exist or not.
> So, I'd prefer #2.
> Any comments are welcome.
> Kinglong Mee
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-devel