[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Branched

[Shyam Ranganathan]

On 01/29/2018 08:39 AM, Aravinda wrote:
> Hi Shyam,
> 
> Below patches identified lately while working on
> Geo-replication+Glusterd2 integration. Patches are merged in Master and
> backported to release-4.0
> 
> https://review.gluster.org/19343  (Ready to submit)
> https://review.gluster.org/19364  (Waiting for centos regression)
> 
> Please merge the patches. Thanks

Thanks for letting me know, one patch is merged, waiting on regression
tests for the other.

> 
> 
> On Thursday 25 January 2018 09:49 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> On 01/23/2018 03:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>> 4.0 release has been branched!
>>>
>>> I will follow this up with a more detailed schedule for the release, and
>>> also the granted feature backport exceptions that we are waiting.
>>>
>>> Feature backports would need to make it in by this weekend, so that we
>>> can tag RC0 by the end of the month.
>> Backports need to be ready for merge on or before Jan, 29th 2018 3:00 PM
>> Eastern TZ.
>>
>> Features that requested and hence are granted backport exceptions are as
>> follows,
>>
>> 1) Dentry fop serializer xlator on brick stack
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397
>>
>> @Du please backport the same to the 4.0 branch as the patch in master is
>> merged.
>>
>> 2) Leases support on GlusterFS
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350
>>
>> @Jiffin and @ndevos, there is one patch pending against master,
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/ please do the needful and backport
>> this to the 4.0 branch.
>>
>> 3) Data corruption in write ordering of rebalance and application writes
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308
>>
>> @susant, @du if we can conclude on the strategy here, please backport as
>> needed.
>>
>> 4) Couple of patches that are tracked for a backport are,
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/ (prep for ctime changes in later
>> releases)
>>
>> Other features discussed are not in scope for a backports to 4.0.
>>
>> If you asked for one and do not see it in this list, shout out!
>>
>>> Only exception could be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
>