[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.0: Branched

[Shyam Ranganathan]

On 01/26/2018 06:41 AM, Raghavendra G wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
> <rgowdapp at redhat.com <mailto:rgowdapp at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     > From: "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>>
>     > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>>,
>     "GlusterFS Maintainers" <maintainers at gluster.org
>     <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>>
>     > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:49:51 PM
>     > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Branched
>     >
>     > On 01/23/2018 03:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>     > > 4.0 release has been branched!
>     > >
>     > > I will follow this up with a more detailed schedule for the release, and
>     > > also the granted feature backport exceptions that we are waiting.
>     > >
>     > > Feature backports would need to make it in by this weekend, so that we
>     > > can tag RC0 by the end of the month.
>     >
>     > Backports need to be ready for merge on or before Jan, 29th 2018 3:00 PM
>     > Eastern TZ.
>     >
>     > Features that requested and hence are granted backport exceptions are as
>     > follows,
>     >
>     > 1) Dentry fop serializer xlator on brick stack
>     > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397>
>     >
>     > @Du please backport the same to the 4.0 branch as the patch in master is
>     > merged.
> 
>     Sure.
> 
> 
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19340/1
> But this might fail smoke as the bug associated is not associated with
> 4.0 branch. Blocked on 4.0 version tag in bugzilla.

Fixed this up to refer to the feature and removed the bug reference and
change the gerrit topic.

> 
> 
>     >
>     > 2) Leases support on GlusterFS
>     > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350>
>     >
>     > @Jiffin and @ndevos, there is one patch pending against master,
>     > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/> please do the needful and
>     backport
>     > this to the 4.0 branch.
>     >
>     > 3) Data corruption in write ordering of rebalance and application writes
>     > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308
>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308>
>     >
>     > @susant, @du if we can conclude on the strategy here, please backport as
>     > needed.
> 
>     https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19207/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19207/>
>     Review comments need to be addressed and centos regressions are failing.
> 
>     https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19202/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19202/>
>     There are some suggestions on the patch. If others agree they are
>     valid, this patch can be considered as redundant with approach of
>     #19207. However, as I've mentioned in the comments there are some
>     tradeoffs too. So, Waiting for response to my comments. If nobody
>     responds in the time period given, we can merge the patch and susant
>     will have to backport to 4.0 branch.
> 
>     >
>     > 4) Couple of patches that are tracked for a backport are,
>     > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/>
>     > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/> (prep for ctime changes in later
>     > releases)
>     >
>     > Other features discussed are not in scope for a backports to 4.0.
>     >
>     > If you asked for one and do not see it in this list, shout out!
>     >
>     > >
>     > > Only exception could be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/>
>     > >
>     > > Thanks,
>     > > Shyam
>     > > _______________________________________________
>     > > Gluster-devel mailing list
>     > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>     > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
>     > >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > maintainers mailing list
>     > maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>     > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers>
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>     http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Raghavendra G