[Gluster-devel] Master branch lock down status (Fri, August 9th)

Shyam Ranganathan srangana at redhat.com
Sat Aug 11 16:12:00 UTC 2018


On 08/10/2018 09:59 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Today's patch set is 9 [1].
> 
> Total of 7 runs for line-coverage, mux regressions, centos7 regressions
> are running (some are yet to complete).
> 
> Test failure summary is as follows,
Updating this section
1. ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (3 cores, 1 retry)
2. ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (1 failure, 1 retry)
3.
./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t
(2 retries)
4. (NEW) ./tests/basic/afr/replace-brick-self-heal.t (1 retry)
5. ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t (2 retires, 1 core)
6. (NEW) ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1408712.t (1 retry) (ravi looking at it)
7. replace-brick-self-heal.t (1 retry)
8. ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (1 retry)

> 
> Test output can be found at, [2] and [3]. [2] will be updated as runs
> that are still ongoing complete.

Above is also updated to find the runs where the tests fail.

> 
> Shyam
> [1] Patch set: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/9
> [2] Sheet recording failures:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit#gid=1535799585
> [3] Comment on patch set 9 recording runs till now:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637#message-07f3886dda133ed642438eb9e82b82d957668e86
> On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep enough.
>>
>> NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on
>> how to find failures.
>>
>> 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2].
>>
>> 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run
>> Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run
>> that it failed in.
>>
>> 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think
>> you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out.
>>
>> 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with
>> your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as
>> comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted).
>>
>> 5) Current test failures
>> We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or
>> attention, (If something is incorrect, write back).
>>
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs
>> attention)
>> ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh)
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t
>> (Atin)
>> ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish)
>> ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh)
>> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention)
>> ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention)
>> ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention)
>> ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention)
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin)
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi)
>>
>> Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores
>> in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new.
>>
>> ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t
>> ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t
>> ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t
>> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t
>> ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t
>> ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t
>>
>> 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are,
>>
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t
>> ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t
>> ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t
>> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t
>> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t
>> ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t
>> ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t
>> ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t
>>
>> Shyam (and Atin)
>>
>> On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same.
>>>
>>> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in
>>> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions
>>> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed.
>>>
>>> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit
>>> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay.
>>>
>>> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my
>>> destabilize it.
>>>
>>> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present here
>>> [3].
>>>
>>> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this
>>> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>>
>>> [1] Patches that address regression failures:
>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com
>>>
>>> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run:
>>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637
>>>
>>> [3] Failing tests list:
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> [4] Nightly run dashboard: https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list