[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Master branch lock down status (Thu, August 09th)

Fri Aug 10 14:09:29 UTC 2018

Pranith,

https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20685 seems to have caused
multiple failure runs out of
https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/8 out of yesterday's report.
Did you get a chance to look at it?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:03 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:34 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Today's test results are updated in the spreadsheet in sheet named "Run
>> patch set 8".
>>
>> I took in patch https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20685 which
>> caused quite a few failures, so not updating new failures as issue yet.
>>
>> Please look at the failures for tests that were retried and passed, as
>> the logs for the initial runs should be preserved from this run onward.
>>
>> Otherwise nothing else to report on the run status, if you are averse to
>> spreadsheets look at this comment in gerrit [1].
>>
>> Shyam
>>
>> [1] Patch set 8 run status:
>>
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20637/8#message-54de30fa384fd02b0426d9db6d07fad4eeefcf08
>> On 08/07/2018 07:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > Deserves a new beginning, threads on the other mail have gone deep
>> enough.
>> >
>> > NOTE: (5) below needs your attention, rest is just process and data on
>> > how to find failures.
>> >
>> > 1) We are running the tests using the patch [2].
>> >
>> > 2) Run details are extracted into a separate sheet in [3] named "Run
>> > Failures" use a search to find a failing test and the corresponding run
>> > that it failed in.
>> >
>> > 3) Patches that are fixing issues can be found here [1], if you think
>> > you have a patch out there, that is not in this list, shout out.
>> >
>> > 4) If you own up a test case failure, update the spreadsheet [3] with
>> > your name against the test, and also update other details as needed (as
>> > comments, as edit rights to the sheet are restricted).
>> >
>> > 5) Current test failures
>> > We still have the following tests failing and some without any RCA or
>> > attention, (If something is incorrect, write back).
>> >
>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1290965-detect-bitrotten-objects.t (needs
>> > attention)
>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t (Kotresh)
>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t
>> > (Atin)
>> > ./tests/bugs/ec/bug-1236065.t (Ashish)
>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t (Kotresh)
>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-1468261.t (needs attention)
>> > ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t (needs attention)
>> > ./tests/basic/afr/granular-esh/replace-brick.t (needs attention)
>> > ./tests/bugs/core/multiplex-limit-issue-151.t (needs attention)
>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/validating-server-quorum.t (Atin)
>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1363721.t (Ravi)
>> >
>> > Here are some newer failures, but mostly one-off failures except cores
>> > in ec-5-2.t. All of the following need attention as these are new.
>> >
>> > ./tests/00-geo-rep/00-georep-verify-setup.t
>> > ./tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav-child-policy.t
>> > ./tests/basic/stats-dump.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1110262.t
>> >
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/mgmt-handshake-and-volume-sync-post-glusterd-restart.t
>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-data-heal.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1448804-check-quorum-type-values.t
>>
>
> Sent https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/20697 for the test above.
>
>
>> >
>> ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1482023-snpashot-issue-with-other-processes-accessing-mounted-path.t
>> > ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-2.t
>> >
>> > 6) Tests that are addressed or are not occurring anymore are,
>> >
>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/rebalance-operations-in-single-node.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/index/bug-1559004-EMLINK-handling.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1386188-sbrain-fav-child.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1433571-undo-pending-only-on-up-bricks.t
>> > ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1117851.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/glusterd/quorum-validation.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1042725.t
>> >
>> ./tests/bugs/replicate/bug-1586020-mark-dirty-for-entry-txn-on-quorum-failure.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1293601.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/bug-1368312.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t
>> > ./tests/bugs/core/bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t
>> >
>> > Shyam (and Atin)
>> >
>> > On 08/05/2018 06:24 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> >> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same.
>> >>
>> >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in
>> >> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions
>> >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed.
>> >>
>> >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit
>> >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay.
>> >>
>> >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my
>> >> destabilize it.
>> >>
>> >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present
>> here
>> >> [3].
>> >>
>> >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this
>> >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shyam
>> >>
>> >> [1] Patches that address regression failures:
>> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com
>> >>
>> >> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run:
>> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637
>> >>
>> >> [3] Failing tests list:
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing
>> >>
>> >> [4] Nightly run dashboard:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20180810/3bdf4023/attachment.html>