[Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

Nithya Balachandran nbalacha at redhat.com
Fri Aug 3 09:08:04 UTC 2018


Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is :

commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c
Author: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530

    performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're
modified while in cache

Krutika, can you take a look and fix this?

To summarize, this is _not_ a spurious failure.


regards,
Nithya


On 3 August 2018 at 14:13, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote:

> This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With
> the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is
> called on the mount point causing the test to fail:
>
>
> With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files
> inside it.
>
> [root at rhgs313-6 ~]# umount -f /mnt/fuse1; mount -t glusterfs -s
> 192.168.122.6:/thunder /mnt/fuse1; ls -l /mnt/fuse1/; echo "Trying
> again"; ls -l /mnt/fuse1
> umount: /mnt/fuse1: not mounted
> total 0
> *----------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 file-1*
> *----------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 file-2*
> *----------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 file-3*
> *----------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 file-4*
> *----------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 file-5*
> *d---------. 0 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 subdir*
> Trying again
> total 3
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug  3 14:06 file-1
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug  3 14:06 file-2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug  3 14:06 file-3
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug  3 14:06 file-4
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33 Aug  3 14:06 file-5
> d---------. 0 root root  0 Jan  1  1970 subdir
> [root at rhgs313-6 ~]#
>
>
>
> This is consistently reproducible. I am still debugging this to see which
> patch caused this.
>
> regards,
> Nithya
>
>
> On 2 August 2018 at 07:13, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 07:05, Susant Palai <spalai at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Will have a look at it and update.
>>>
>>
>> There’s already a patch from Mohit for this.
>>
>>
>>> Susant
>>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 18:58 Krutika Dhananjay, <kdhananj at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Same here - https://build.gluster.org/job/
>>>> centos7-regression/2024/console
>>>>
>>>> -Krutika
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t fails my set up (3 out of 5
>>>>> times) running with master branch. As per my knowledge I've not seen this
>>>>> test failing earlier. Looks like some recent changes has caused it. One of
>>>>> such instance is https://build.gluster.org/job/
>>>>> centos7-regression/1955/ .
>>>>>
>>>>> Request the component owners to take a look at it.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>> --
>> --Atin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20180803/663fca1e/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list