[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.13: (STM release) Details
srangana at redhat.com
Wed Nov 1 10:56:02 UTC 2017
On 10/31/2017 02:52 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> @maintainers on the patch review, please ensure that we have a
> reference for features, else there is a lot we will miss for the
> This was a miss from my end where I should have checked the
> corresponding issue id in the patch. Apologies!
> Can we have a job to check if a bugzilla is used upstream against a
> patch which has a FutureFeature as a keyword, we fail such jobs to
> automate such misses not to happen? And then RFEs can be closed using
> github references?
Is the keyword followed diligently, that we can rely on such a check?
Who adds the keyword to BZ in case others missed adding the same?
I ask, as I was unaware of this keyword myself.
More information about the Gluster-devel