[Gluster-devel] Tests that fail with multiplexing turned on
Amar Tumballi
atumball at redhat.com
Tue May 2 07:12:50 UTC 2017
Thanks for this patch Jeff.
Helps me to run tests with Brick multiplexing enabled.
Instead of manually triggering the run for this patch, as Niels mentioned,
it would be good to have a nightly run which will run with a given patch
(or patches) and all regressions. Planning to take this as a part of Good
Builds effort Nigel is getting done [1].
Regards,
Amar
[1] -
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2017-March/052245.html
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Jeff Darcy <jeff at pl.atyp.us> wrote:
> Since the vast majority of our tests run without multiplexing, I'm going
> to start running regular runs of all tests with multiplexing turned on.
> You can see the patch here:
>
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17145/
>
> There are currently two tests that fail with multiplexing. Note that
> these are all tests that passed as of when multiplexing was introduced.
> I don't know about these specific tests, but most tests had passed with
> multiplexing turned *many times* - sometimes literally over a hundred
> because I did more runs that that during development. These are tests
> that have been broken since then, because without regular tests the
> people making changes could not have known how their changes interact
> with multiplexing.
>
> 19:14:41
> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1367478-volume-start-validation-after-glusterd-
> restart.t
> ..
> 19:14:41 not ok 17 Got "0" instead of "1", LINENUM:37
> 19:14:41 FAILED COMMAND: 1 brick_up_status_1 patchy1 127.1.1.2
> /d/backends/2/patchy12
>
> 20:52:10 ./tests/features/trash.t ..
> 20:52:10 not ok 53 Got "2" instead of "1", LINENUM:221
> 20:52:10 FAILED COMMAND: 1 online_brick_count
> 20:52:10 ok 54, LINENUM:223
> 20:52:10 ok 55, LINENUM:226
> 20:52:10 not ok 56 Got "3" instead of "2", LINENUM:227
> 20:52:10 FAILED COMMAND: 2 online_brick_count
> 20:52:10 ok 57, LINENUM:228
> 20:52:10 ok 58, LINENUM:233
> 20:52:10 ok 59, LINENUM:236
> 20:52:10 ok 60, LINENUM:237
> 20:52:10 not ok 61 , LINENUM:238
> 20:52:10 FAILED COMMAND: [ -e /mnt/glusterfs/0/abc -a ! -e
> /mnt/glusterfs/0/.trashcan ]
>
> Do we have any volunteers to look into these? I looked at the first one
> a bit and didn't find any obvious clues; I haven't looked at the second.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170502/91bb4b03/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list