[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to deprecate replace-brick for "distribute only" volumes
Joe Julian
joe at julianfamily.org
Thu Mar 16 12:59:25 UTC 2017
On March 16, 2017 4:17:04 AM PDT, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: "Atin Mukherjee" <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>
>To: "Raghavendra Talur" <rtalur at redhat.com>, gluster-devel at gluster.org,
>gluster-users at gluster.org
>Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 4:22:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal to deprecate
>replace-brick for "distribute only" volumes
>
>Makes sense.
>
>On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 at 06:51, Raghavendra Talur < rtalur at redhat.com >
>wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>In the last few releases, we have changed replace-brick command such
>that it can be called only with "commit force" option. When invoked,
>this is what happens to the volume:
>
>a. distribute only volume: the given brick is replaced with a empty
>brick with 100% probability of data loss.
>b. distribute-replicate: the given brick is replaced with a empty
>brick and self heal is triggered. If admin is wise enough to monitor
>self heal status before another replace-brick command, data is safe.
>c. distribute-disperse: same as above in distribute-replicate
>
>My proposal is to fully deprecate replace-brick command for
>"distribute only" volumes. It should print out a error "The right way
>to replace brick for distribute only volume is to add brick, wait for
>rebalance to complete and remove brick" and return a "-1".
>
>
>
>
>It makes sense.
>I just don't see any use of add-brick before remove-brick except the
>fact that it will
>help to keep the overall storage capacity of volume intact .
>What is the guarantee that the files on the brick which we want to
>replace
>would migrate to added brick?
>
>If a brick, which we want to replace, is healthy and we just want to
>replace it then perhaps we should provide
>a command to copy those files to new brick and then remove the old
>brick.
We used to have a command that did just that. It was replace-brick.
>
>
>
><blockquote>
>Thoughts?
>
>Thanks,
>Raghavendra Talur
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
></blockquote>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list