[Gluster-devel] Disperse volume : Sequential Writes

Ashish Pandey aspandey at redhat.com
Thu Jun 15 06:21:43 UTC 2017


Hi All, 

We have been facing some issues in disperse (EC) volume. 
We know that currently EC is not good for random IO as it requires READ-MODIFY-WRITE fop 
cycle if an offset and offset+length falls in the middle of strip size. 

Unfortunately, it could also happen with sequential writes. 
Consider an EC volume with configuration 4+2. The stripe size for this would be 512 * 4 = 2048. That is, 2048 bytes of user data stored in one stripe. 
Let's say 2048 + 512 = 2560 bytes are already written on this volume. 512 Bytes would be in second stripe. 
Now, if there are sequential writes with offset 2560 and of size 1 Byte, we have to read the whole stripe, encode it with 1 Byte and then again have to write it back. 
Next, write with offset 2561 and size of 1 Byte will again READ-MODIFY-WRITE the whole stripe. This is causing bad performance. 

There are some tools and scenario's where such kind of load is coming and users are not aware of that. 
Example: fio and zip 

Solution: 
One possible solution to deal with this issue is to keep last stripe in memory. 
This way, we need not to read it again and we can save READ fop going over the network. 
Considering the above example, we have to keep last 2048 bytes (maximum) in memory per file. This should not be a big 
deal as we already keep some data like xattr's and size info in memory and based on that we take decisions. 

Please provide your thoughts on this and also if you have any other solution. 

--- 
Ashish 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170615/eabe50ca/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list